[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [stp-dev] merging SC and SAF

I actually have the same understanding of what a subproject should be.
 
I guess where I am thinking differently is where I see the boundaries of those those coarse grained goals.
 
To me the core project should focus on the the development of the core model and its extension mechanisms, which is not what SAF nor SC are about, instead those 2 projects are about building a tooling integration/development platform and this is where I would see the logical boundaries.
 
also, given the nature of the charter of the STP project, I  believe that the tooling platform side of things will grow to much more that just a couple of features and a small set of plugins.
 
rgds,
d.
 
 


From: stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel Berg
Sent: 12 May 2006 03:25
To: STP Dev list
Cc: STP Dev list; stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [stp-dev] merging SC and SAF


Here is my two cents on the topic.

I agree that the tooling from both should be merged into a single subproject.  Is there a strong reason to split the core subproject like this?  I view the SAF framework an extension to the models which would argue that it belongs in the same subproject.  A subproject is typically more coarse grain and is not typically just a single feature or just a small set of plugins.  The subproject has a cohesive set of code that works together to achieve a goal.  In this case they serve as the core platform for which the STP project is built.

Regards,
Dan



"Beaurpere, David" <David.Beaurpere@xxxxxxxx>
Sent by: stp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/11/2006 05:45 AM

Please respond to
STP Dev list <stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
"STP Dev list" <stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[stp-dev] merging SC and SAF





 
I would like to suggest to merge the SC and SAF subprojects together in a new project aimed at a dev tooling platform.
 
The rational behind is basically that: I do not have a name or particular setup to suggest and I guess that the idea would have to be approved by the PMC before anything happens but I just wanted to put the idea out there to see what people think of it.
 
rgds,
d.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
stp-dev mailing list
stp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stp-dev