RE: [stellation-res] Source Code Consistency

["Mark C. Chu-Carroll" <mcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 20:35, Jonathan Gossage wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: stellation-res-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:stellation-res-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mark C.
> > Chu-Carroll
> > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:19 PM
> > To: Stellation-res
> > Subject: Re: [stellation-res] Source Code Consistency
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 19:30, Jonathan Gossage wrote:
> > > Is the code in CVS completely up to date? I downloaded from CVS
> > at 7:00PM
> > > and found that the new projects org.eclipse.stellation.stim and
> > > org.eclipse.stellation.task do not compile because they expect new
> > > constructors in Message and Engine. It would seem that these
> > classes have
> > > not yet been updated.
> >
> > I'm working on it :-)
> >
> > I checked the stim and task projects in, and then starting going
> > through the todo's marked in the code, and made a bundle of
> > changes trying to get rid of as many of them as possible.
> >
> > I also renamed org.eclipse.stellation.core to
> > org.eclipse.stellation.repos - for Eclipse,
> > the plugin name and the basic package name really should
> > be the same - and with the refactoring that we've done, separating
> > out the remote and cli projects, it really is just the bare repository.
> >
> > I also separated out the utility classes into a util project. This
> > makes it possible to compile the task and stim code independently
> > of the core, which is a good thing - the less tangling, the better.
> >
> > Now, obviously, this many changes is kind of a big deal - and
> > it's exactly what CVS is worst at, but that Stellation is good
> > at.
> >
> > But, all of that means fixing the ant file, which I haven't
> > done yet.
> >
> > So.. I'm working on finishing up this batch of stuff. I should
> > be able to finish the ant script and testing tonight, and check
> > it into Stellation tomorrow. I'll also package up a downloadable
> > tar file for FTP on our server.
> >
> Am I right in assuming that Ant will build the client as well as the server
> stuff?

Yup. 

	-Mark


> 
> Regards
> 
> Jonathan Gossage
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stellation-res mailing list
> stellation-res@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stellation-res
-- 
Mark Craig Chu-Carroll,  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center  
*** The Stellation project: Advanced SCM for Collaboration
***      http://stellation.eclipse.org
*** Work: mcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/Home: markcc@xxxxxxxxxxx