Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [stellation-res] Status of VSF Concept Demo (on 2.1)

Jim, 

I'm perusing the source now.  Thanks!  I'll let you know how my work
overlaps with yours.  Would you like feedback as I go or would you rather
I wait until vsf functionality is higher on your priority list?  I know
how expsenive these context switches can be...


-phil




On Tue, 13 May 2003, Jim Wright - IBM Research wrote:

> At 03:23 PM 5/13/2003, Philip Quitslund wrote:
> >Jim,
> >
> >Changing from the default package did the trick!  Thanks!
> >
> >It sounds like you're VERY busy these days but I wonder if there are any
> >plans to work on the Fragment Editor idea.  We discussed this a bit at
> >AOSD and I was and am interested in possibly helping with this piece.
> 
> We _are_ quite busy :) but it's still fun.
> I very much want to pick up the Fragment Editor again; it's fairly high
> (3rd or 4th from the top) on my priority list, after the task service 
> facilities
> Mark has mentioned, and finishing up the current Stellation SCM Eclipse client.
> 
> >Just let me know.
> 
> I'll post the list when I restart work on this.
> 
> 
> 
> >-phil
> >
> >ps: I know it was just a demo but is the source for the demo available for
> >perusal?  If so, I'd be curious...
> 
> Sure.  It's checked into CVS; the project name is 
> org.eclipse.stellation.scm.vsf.
> There is also a project named org.eclipse.stellation.scm.vsf.feature, which 
> handles
> packaging the VSF plugin into an Update Manager-installable 'Eclipse Feature'.
> 
> It's not terribly pretty (90% was written during a 10-day heads-down rush 
> before
> last year's OOPSLA), but it does some interesting things with the Eclipse 
> text editor and
> JDT frameworks nontheless.  (As you found out, it's definitely not 
> bug-free, but
> as they say "demo is for blowing things up..").
> 
> Glad you're interested ---
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >On Tue, 13 May 2003, Jim Wright - IBM Research wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Phil,
> > >
> > > I'll take a look and let you know.
> > > I last ran the demo at the recent AOSD conference in Boston,
> > > using Eclipse 2.1 (prerelease?) if memory serves.
> > >
> > > Hmm.  Are you using a named package, or just the default package?
> > > It's quite possible the VSF code doesn't handle the default package 
> > properly.
> > >
> > > Please let me know either way --
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jim
> > >
> > >
> > > At 02:37 PM 5/13/2003, Philip Quitslund wrote:
> > > >Hey Jim (and all),
> > > >
> > > >I'm wondering about the status for the VSF Demo on 2.1.  I'm getting the
> > > >following error from org.eclipse.stellation.scm.vsf when I try and create
> > > >a VSFspec from a .java file:
> > > >
> > > >         parseFragmentName: not enough segments in name
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >The .java looks like this:
> > > >
> > > >         public class Hello {
> > > >                 public String toString() {
> > > >                         return "hello";
> > > >                 }
> > > >         }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >-phil
> > > >
> > > >
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jim Wright, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
> *** The Stellation project: Advanced SCM for Collaboration
> *** http://www.eclipse.org/stellation
> *** Work Email: jwright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Personal Email: 
> jim.wright@xxxxxxx
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stellation-res mailing list
> stellation-res@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stellation-res
> 



Back to the top