Re: [stellation-res] Windows Port

["Jonathan Gossage" <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You are not the only ones who have been swamped )-:
I will check them out tonight. I will also check out a rumor that Firebird
1.5 allows symbolic names for databases that are resolved with a
configuration file on the server. If this is the case then we can revert to
the previous database location syntax as long as we require at least
Firebird 1.5.

Regards

Jonathan


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Wright - IBM Research" <jwright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <stellation-res@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 2:49 PM
Subject: [stellation-res] Windows Port


> Jonathan,
>
> Back on May 1, I posted an attachment to your Bugzilla #35267
> "Windows Port Patch", with some revised scripts and other files.
> In a followup message (same day), I posed a question about
> whether the scripts should attempt to handle multiple database
> types in a single run (which complicates things significantly),
> rather than using a separate properties file to select a particular
> database.
>
> Do you have any thoughts about that?  Have you had a chance
> to check out the scripts I posted?  Mark and I would like to
> check them in.
>
> I've also realized that the Eclipse client code must be updated
> to handle the new database path delimiter scheme as
> well as the new Firebird type; the current Eclipse client code base is
> inconsistent (broken) w.r.t. the current Stellation Core. :<
>
> - Jim
> --
> Jim Wright, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
> *** The Stellation project: Advanced SCM for Collaboration
> *** http://www.eclipse.org/stellation
> *** Work Email: jwright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Personal Email:
> jim.wright@xxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> stellation-res mailing list
> stellation-res@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stellation-res