[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [stellation-res] Svcadmin
|
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: stellation-res-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >[mailto:stellation-res-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mark C.
> >Chu-Carroll
> >Sent: January 2, 2003 2:42 PM
> >To: Stellation-res
> >Subject: Re: [stellation-res] Svcadmin
> >
> >
> >On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 00:29, Jonathan Gossage wrote:
> >> It was mentioned recently that we are going to want to install Svcadmin
> >> independently of other Stellation components. If this is the
> >case should the
> >> Svcadmin classes be moved into a package of their own with an
> >independent
> >> Eclipse project?
> >
> >I don't think so. There's just not enough to it for it to make sense
> >creating another project. Really, svcadmin is *one* source file, which
> >calls a few things from other places. There's just not enough there to
> >justify a separate package. I think it's fine with the CLI stuff; when
> >we put together a nice installer, we can provide options for whether or
> >not to install svcadmin.
> >
> > -Mark
> >
However, if you fold the database configuration stuff I proposed, it will
get a bit larger. Also, independent packaging makes for lower coupling
between sub-systems. I don't feel that the number of classes is a necessary
determinant for package partitioning.
Regards
Jonathan
Personal Email
jgossage@xxxxxxxx
Business Email
jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
