Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [stellation-res] Adding artifact priority

                                                                                                                                               
                      "Mark C. Chu-Carroll"                                                                                                    
                      <mcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>             To:       stellation-res@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dave Shields <shields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>         
                      Sent by:                         cc:                                                                                     
                      stellation-res-admin@dev.        Subject:  Re: [stellation-res] Adding artifact priority                                 
                      eclipse.org                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                               
                      08/09/2002 05:27 PM                                                                                                      
                      Please respond to                                                                                                        
                      stellation-res                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                               






Mark wrote:

> Actually, how about just make the priorities an integer, let them be
> signed, and run them in increasing order? Then we put Compound at 0,
> which is a nice central distinguished position. That way, we've got as
large a
>range as we could possibly want.

I vote +1 for this. Putting priority in the agents avoids having to change
the database
schema. However, it does raise another issue -- how to tell apart different
versions of an agent --but
that is another problem that should be put on the back burner.

Using 0 as the distinguished position is a good idea, as it gives us
"something for nothing"!

dave







Back to the top