Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [spatial4j-dev] Timeline for a 0.5 release?
Thanks for the info David. That all sounds great. Let me know if there is anyway i can help. Happy to donate some cycles to help get a release out. 



On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:22 AM, david.w.smiley@xxxxxxxxx <david.w.smiley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Justin,

It’s crossed my mind too.  There’s a test failure I want to diagnose: https://github.com/locationtech/spatial4j/issues/113 sometime in the next few days.  After that; let’s have a 5.0 release?  If miraculously I still have some momentum with getting more done in Spatial4j; the next on my Spatial4j list is https://github.com/locationtech/spatial4j/issues/77 for which I have a branch of some code in progress last year.  It would be awesome to get that done finally for 5.0 but I’m not so sure of the time I’ll have.  But there’s certainly enough goodness in 5.0 with all the GeoJSON and writing WKT/GeoJSON that 5.0 will be great enough as it is.

~ David


On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:11 AM Justin Deoliveira <jdeolive@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey folks. 

I was curious to whether there was a plan to cut a newer spatial4j artifact and make it available in maven central? I have a project [1] that depends on some features (the shape i/o stuff) that aren't in 0.4.1, which from what I can tell is the latest available version. 

Thanks!

-Justin

_______________________________________________
spatial4j-dev mailing list
spatial4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/spatial4j-dev
--
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker

_______________________________________________
spatial4j-dev mailing list
spatial4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/spatial4j-dev

Back to the top