Re: [spatial4j-dev] [spatial4j] [CORE] Add normalizePoint convenience me

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [spatial4j-dev] [spatial4j] [CORE] Add normalizePoint convenience method (#89)

From: Ryan McKinley <ryantxu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 20:56:43 -0700
Delivered-to: spatial4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.locationtech.org/mailman/private/spatial4j-dev>
List-help: <mailto:spatial4j-dev-request@locationtech.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/spatial4j-dev>, <mailto:spatial4j-dev-request@locationtech.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.locationtech.org/mailman/options/spatial4j-dev>, <mailto:spatial4j-dev-request@locationtech.org?subject=unsubscribe>

hymm -- check my comments at the bottom of #89. I bet this was a product of making a commit. I did not do anything to explicitly change status, but I bet the github move somehow made the various PRs incompatible!

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:38 PM, david.w.smiley@xxxxxxxxx <david.w.smiley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ryan, Why did you close a bunch of issues that aren’t done?

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:37 PM Ryan McKinley <notifications@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Closed #89.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

--
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

References:
- Re: [spatial4j-dev] [spatial4j] [CORE] Add normalizePoint convenience method (#89)
  - From: david.w.smiley@xxxxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: [spatial4j-dev] [spatial4j] [CORE] Add normalizePoint convenience method (#89)
Next by Date: Re: [spatial4j-dev] Source headers, about files, etc.
Previous by thread: Re: [spatial4j-dev] [spatial4j] [CORE] Add normalizePoint convenience method (#89)
Next by thread: [spatial4j-dev] Geo3D
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs