Re: [soa-iwg] Content of the Eclipse SOA Package

[Oisin Hurley <ohurley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I don't think that including the ECF distributed OSGi work (i.e.  
> RFC119 and dependencies) at all leads to a disintegrated set of  
> components.  A coherent SOA package, by my definition, would include  
> that work...since it represents the available work from the Runtime  
> projects on that section of OSGi 4.2.
For 'coherence' there would need to be a level of useful
integration and guided tooling around creating a Remote
Service using the DOSGi capabilities, PDE etc.

Same goes for any other runtime that's being included,
of course, I'm not picking on ECF specifically.
>  As for participation...I consider creating the relevant
> software significant participation.

Your opinion is interesting - but what does everyone
else think?

> > BTW, I think ECF being the wire between equinox based SCA runtimes
> > would really make a lot of sense :-)
> >
>
> Me too.  So I think we've established that most of what it takes to
> effect it is some sense.

I'm reading that last sentence to have a rather insulting
and abusive meaning. But I must be making an error. Any
chance you could expand on it a bit more?

 cheers
  --oh