[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [science-iwg] Rebooting the Science Working Group
|
Hi all,
It’s good to see some discussion about how to get the working group going again. While we’ve scaled back our Eclipse work generally, we’re still using ICE and planning to contribute to it in the future, so I would like to maintain some level of ORNL involvement in the working group and in the Foundation in general. I think opening it up to a broader membership would be a good thing, but I would also like to think about what the purpose of the group might be as we go forward, as well as how to make it more sustainable.
I’m not sure what our (ORNL’s) situation w.r.t. to the group actually is. I know we’re still a member of the Eclipse Foundation, but I’m not sure if we have official membership on the group or not. Can some one clarify?
Thanks,
Greg
> On Feb 11, 2021, at 3:38 PM, Torkild U. Resheim <torkildr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> It's so great to see these familiar names in response to Jay's message :) I'm optimistic about the future of the working group and I'm really looking forward to getting together again!
>
> Thank you for the detailed and concrete summary Jay. I have created Google Document[1] which we can use for working on the revised charter. Any one that has the link can comment, so you will have to ask me for permission if you want to edit directly. Please use the suggestions mechanism when you do any changes.
>
> Also note that this a revised version of the charter that includes changes proposed by the Foundation for dealing with regulations related to the new European business entity.
>
> Best regards,
> Torkild
>
> [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/180PaiyqHu60lwyEkTI_oGMyA8OcqFQGcMji-G-y6tqw/edit#
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> science-iwg mailing list
> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
