[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [rt-pmc] [CQ 2974] JPA Version: 2.0
|
+1 go ahead as suggested
Best
Ricco
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 19.01.2009 um 18:11 schrieb "Douglas Clarke" <DOUGLAS.CLARKE@xxxxxxxxxx
>:
> Fellow RT PMC,
>
> This CQ is basically approval for delivering preview functionality
> of JPA 2.0 based on a draft of the specification made available by
> JSR 317 expert group. As part of developing the reference
> implementation we need to implement the functionality specified in
> the draft(s).
>
> The IP coming in is clearly stated in the draft as an extension our
> current JPA 1.0 functionality.
>
> NOTE: We continue to ensure that EclipseLink releases are JPA 1.0
> compliant so that consumers of EclipseLink releases including the
> JPA 2.0 preview features have the choice of not using them until the
> specification is completed and the compliant RI is delivered.
>
> I am in favour of a quick +1 on this but since it is a little
> different then the norm I thought I would allow you to voice any
> conflicting opinions before we proceed.
>
> Doug
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 12:01 PM
> To: rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [rt-pmc] [CQ 2974] JPA Version: 2.0
>
>
> http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2974
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from Peter Krogh <peter.krogh@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-19
> 12:01:08 ---
> This is an extension of approved CQ 1616 - JPA 1.0.
>
>
> --
> Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the CQ.
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
