http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22345
They told me I didn’t need an IP log.
Håvard
That's changed, we don't need release reviews if we've done one in the past 12 months. Like how you didn't do one for 3.3 either 😁
However I forgot I may need to run an IP log and get it approved so perhaps my release plan is a little short notice still.
Cheers,
Jeen
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020, at 18:05, Håvard Ottestad wrote:
I though the Eclipse guidelines required a week long community review phase a minor release.
Håvard
Following up from this, that I plan release RDF4J 3.4.0 next week, on Tuesday (give or take a day depending on how we go with some last minute merges :))
Cheers,
Jeen
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020, at 17:29, Jeen Broekstra wrote:
I hadn't even thought of that (very obvious) alternative yet: I'll just do a 3.4 release end of this week (or early next if there is a holdup), and skip the patch release.
Thanks!
Jeen
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020, at 17:13, Håvard Ottestad wrote:
I’m fine with a 3.4.0 release. We have chosen semantic versioning, so it’s natural that there will be a lot of minor releases.
There was no need for a CQ review btw.
Håvard
>
_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
_______________________________________________rdf4j-dev mailing listrdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxTo unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev
|
