|[rdf4j-dev] SHACL and checking rdfs:Resource|
A quick question about the SHACL validator in 3.0-snapshot, or SHACL In general
I’ve noticed that the new EU DCAT-AP 1.2 has a few shapes with a class constraint like
which IMHO does not make sense (since rdfs:Resource is, well, anything…),
but the validator does seem to generate a violation if this class is not explicitly set.
So would it be appropriate to just ignore this rule in the validator ? Or am I missing something here ?