How should we do that? I would like to do the same with much of the Feedback view, since it hasn't had much exercise yet, and I'd like to reserve the right to change it.
I have seen several ways to mark something as provisional (not API).
I prefer NOT to change the package name, because then i would have to change it late, and it would presumably break all the clients.
...Beth
Beth Tibbitts
Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform http://eclipse.org/ptp
IBM STG Communications Protocols and Tools
Mailing Address: IBM Corp., Coldstream Research Campus, 745 West New Circle Road, Lexington, KY 40511
Greg Watson ---05/21/2010 03:21:51 PM---Sure. You've marked interfaces as provisional, right? Greg
From: |
Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
To: |
Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
05/21/2010 03:21 PM |
Subject: |
Re: [ptp-dev] API tooling |
Sent by: |
ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Sure. You've marked interfaces as provisional, right?
Greg
On May 21, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Chris Recoskie <recoskie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm a bit concerned with declaring RDT to be API yet, as there is still work to be done to move the RSE specific implementation into its own plugin. I want to leave it provisional for now till we have a chance to fix that.
We can set all the RDT packages to be x-internal=true, and then the API tooling will ignore them.
===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto
<graycol.gif>Greg Watson ---05/20/2010 06:17:06 PM---Hi, You may have noticed that I've now enabled API tooling on all PTP plugins (except Photran, sorry
<ecblank.gif>
From: | <ecblank.gif>
Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
<ecblank.gif>
To: | <ecblank.gif>
Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
<ecblank.gif>
Date: | <ecblank.gif>
05/20/2010 06:17 PM |
<ecblank.gif>
Subject: | <ecblank.gif>
[ptp-dev] API tooling |
<ecblank.gif>
Sent by: | <ecblank.gif>
ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|