+1
On 05/04/2015 11:18 AM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
I'm dumbfounded. I can't fathom why Dani, Matthias, and Martin are
not already on the AC.
Alexander was nominated and received overwhelming support for
appointment, but it looks like the last bit of follow up never
happened. I've given that a kick.
Pascal has previously been on the AC as a member company
representative, and I swear that we had started the nomination
process for him to be appointed last year, but don't see it in the
archive.
Max is listed as a mentor for Andmore. This oversight is
completely my fault; normally I check this sort of thing, but must
have just assumed he was a member. So I'll add him to my "I'm
dumbfounded" list.
It's high-time to nominate Lars as well.
If there is no objection, I'd like to nominate you all for
appointment to the AC.
Appointment to the AC is a recognition that you've been a pretty
big deal to the Eclipse Community. In practical terms, this will
put you the AC mailing list and invite you to join the monthly
calls. This will also give you the ability to volunteer to mentor
new projects, though there is no specific requirement to do so.
If you'd rather not join the AC, please let me know either via
this list or private email before May 14.
The nomination process starts by bringing up the nomination on the
call. If there is consensus, we initiate a public discussion on
the mailing list; the the results of that public discussion are
sent to Mike with a recommendation to appoint. I'm pretty sure
that he's equally dumbfounded that you're not all already members.
Wayne
On 04/05/15 03:16 AM, Sohn, Matthias
wrote:
+1 for retirement, I am also not a member of the AC
+1 for the retirement. I'm also not part of
the AC
Am 04.05.2015 9:01 vorm. schrieb
"Daniel Megert" < daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Wayne
> Everybody that is actively participating in
this group is either on the AC or should be.
Wayne, I'm not.
Dani
From:
Wayne
Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
platform-vision@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
01.05.2015
21:29
Subject:
Re:
[platform-vision] Platform Vision meeting, April
22/2015
Sent
by: platform-vision-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
I'm thinking that the need for the
Platform Vision group to meet on a bi-weekly basis
has passed.
I believe that everything that we've been talking
about lately is appropriate for a more general
audience, e.g. the Architecture Council.
Everybody that is actively participating in this
group is either on the AC or should be.
Is there any objection to suspending our biweekly
call in favour of adding content to the monthly AC
call?
Wayne
On 21/04/15 11:52 AM, Wayne Beaton
wrote:
We have a call scheduled for tomorrow
at 11 AM EDT.
--
Phone numbers
North America 1-866-569-4992
Germany 49-692-2224-6059
France 33-(0)-17-070-8535
UK 0800-033-7806
Switzerland 41-44-580-2115
Sweden 46-85-063-8386
Italy 003-902-3604-8268
Then enter the participant conference extension:
430, then enter pin 4718
Alternatively, SIP clients can call 430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, then enter pin 4718
--
The Eclipse Foundation has engaged with UX experts
to review the initial user experience with Eclipse.
This includes the website, download, and
installation process. Ideally, we'd like to look at
the Welcome page as well, but I'm pretty sure that
we don't have the resources right now to actually
implement any changes.
Pascal is working on code changes and tests to
various parts of Eclipse (p2, launcher, tycho)
including changing the Mac layout and packaging as a
.dmg file. It would be great if Pascal can elaborate
on the call.
We've the UX experts on the Oomph Installer. Eike
and--with help from Yatta--put some serious UX work
into the installer. Eike presented it to the UX
folks last week. I am concerned that some of the the
project descriptions (e.g. targets) in the Oomph
repository have gotten stale. Keeping these up to
date is a challenge that we (collectively) need to
address.
The "profiles" work that we've been investigating is
an extension to the Oomph notion of packages and
configurations. A profile is a higher level concept
that combines the package definition with the
workspace configuration. The idea is to make it
possible for users to snapshot and share their
profiles. This also includes the ability to capture
and share preferences. I'm not happy with the term
"profile" as it suggests personal information (e.g.
Facebook profile), but we haven't come up with an
alternative. We've decided to defer profiles, as
there just isn't enough time for Mars.
Buildship (Gradle) CQs have been created and we have
code. The Planning Council has rejected their
inclusion in Mars. We've engaged to Tools PMC to
attempt an appeal. Any ideas you might have are
welcome.
I'd like to talk a bit about the composition of the
"Eclipse Project" Marketplace.
Wayne
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
[attachment
"atth36ns.png" deleted by Daniel
Megert/Zurich/IBM] [attachment
"eclipsecon-100x100-roundgoing.png" deleted by
Daniel Megert/Zurich/IBM] _______________________________________________
platform-vision mailing list
platform-vision@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your
password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vision
_______________________________________________
platform-vision mailing list
platform-vision@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your
password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vision
_______________________________________________
platform-vision mailing list
platform-vision@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vision
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
_______________________________________________
platform-vision mailing list
platform-vision@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vision
|