I'm not part of the AC either
On 05/04/2015 03:01 AM, Daniel Megert wrote:
Hi Wayne
> Everybody
that
is actively participating in this group is either on the AC or
should be.
Wayne, I'm not.
Dani
From:
Wayne Beaton
<wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
platform-vision@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
01.05.2015 21:29
Subject:
Re: [platform-vision]
Platform Vision meeting, April 22/2015
Sent by:
platform-vision-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
I'm thinking that the need for the Platform Vision
group
to meet on a bi-weekly basis has passed.
I believe that everything that we've been talking about lately
is appropriate
for a more general audience, e.g. the Architecture Council.
Everybody that is actively participating in this group is either
on the
AC or should be.
Is there any objection to suspending our biweekly call in favour
of adding
content to the monthly AC call?
Wayne
On 21/04/15 11:52 AM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
We have a call scheduled for tomorrow at 11 AM EDT.
--
Phone numbers
North America 1-866-569-4992
Germany 49-692-2224-6059
France 33-(0)-17-070-8535
UK 0800-033-7806
Switzerland 41-44-580-2115
Sweden 46-85-063-8386
Italy 003-902-3604-8268
Then enter the participant conference extension: 430, then enter
pin 4718
Alternatively, SIP clients can call 430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
then enter pin 4718
--
The Eclipse Foundation has engaged with UX experts to review the
initial
user experience with Eclipse. This includes the website,
download, and
installation process. Ideally, we'd like to look at the Welcome
page as
well, but I'm pretty sure that we don't have the resources right
now to
actually implement any changes.
Pascal is working on code changes and tests to various parts of
Eclipse
(p2, launcher, tycho) including changing the Mac layout and
packaging as
a .dmg file. It would be great if Pascal can elaborate on the
call.
We've the UX experts on the Oomph Installer. Eike and--with help
from Yatta--put
some serious UX work into the installer. Eike presented it to
the UX folks
last week. I am concerned that some of the the project
descriptions (e.g.
targets) in the Oomph repository have gotten stale. Keeping
these up to
date is a challenge that we (collectively) need to address.
The "profiles" work that we've been investigating is an
extension
to the Oomph notion of packages and configurations. A profile is
a higher
level concept that combines the package definition with the
workspace configuration.
The idea is to make it possible for users to snapshot and share
their profiles.
This also includes the ability to capture and share preferences.
I'm not
happy with the term "profile" as it suggests personal
information
(e.g. Facebook profile), but we haven't come up with an
alternative. We've
decided to defer profiles, as there just isn't enough time for
Mars.
Buildship (Gradle) CQs have been created and we have code. The
Planning
Council has rejected their inclusion in Mars. We've engaged to
Tools PMC
to attempt an appeal. Any ideas you might have are welcome.
I'd like to talk a bit about the composition of the "Eclipse
Project"
Marketplace.
Wayne
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
[attachment
"atth36ns.png" deleted by Daniel Megert/Zurich/IBM]
[attachment
"eclipsecon-100x100-roundgoing.png" deleted by Daniel
Megert/Zurich/IBM]
_______________________________________________
platform-vision mailing list
platform-vision@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vision
_______________________________________________
platform-vision mailing list
platform-vision@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vision
|