[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [platform-ui-dev] RFC: Cut, Copy, Paste Proposal (end date = 12/03)
|
We still have a separation of concerns between different views. I think
it should work the same for internal vs. external.
Having different code for internal vs. external is a maintenance
nightmare.
This has been a topic recently on EC because people have been trying to do
their own D&D within their own view, then have it work differently when
talking to the platform.
The recommendation was to just use SWT's support with your own transfers.
Nick
"Mike Wilson/OTT/OTI" <Mike_Wilson@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: platform-ui-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/29/01 11:29 AM
Please respond to platform-ui-dev
To: platform-ui-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc: platform-ui-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [platform-ui-dev] RFC: Cut, Copy, Paste Proposal (end date = 12/03)
Only for the "cut between workbench and desktop" case. Between workbench
windows, you control both the source and the destination, so you know when
it happens. The more general version, which requires a callback from the
window system is not implementable on all platforms.
McQ.
"Nick Edgar/OTT/OTI" <Nick_Edgar@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: platform-ui-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/29/2001 10:52 AM
Please respond to platform-ui-dev
To: platform-ui-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc:
Subject: Re: [platform-ui-dev] RFC: Cut, Copy, Paste
Proposal (end date = 12/03)
<snip>
In any case, we would still need the callback for when the cut gets
completed or canceled, so we can restore the image or attribute.
<snip>