All,
I posted a comment to their blog but it looks like they will
not publish it.. Here is what i remember writing more or less:
“As someone involved with AMQP before its OASIS and ISO days
as well as MQTT as soon as IBM released it in the public domain
you have some quite valid points. However:
1. There are reasons behind them, if you had asked the TC you
would know them.
2. Its extremely hard to not regard your remarkable effort as
biased when you publish it the moment that the OASIS public
review period finishes. You had all the opportunity in the world
to send these comments and allow the TC to respond before
writing a blog post.
Finally, as Rick (ThingWorx) states above, IBM and Microsoft
are not the only middleware vendors out there, and quite a few
of us believe there is room for both protocols. An example of
such an approach is also our own product, Universal Messaging
which despite the fact it has its own over the wire protocol for
over 15 years, is involved in both efforts, already supports
MQTT 3.1 / 3.1.1 and will be supporting AMQP 1.0 in the not so
distant future."
Thanks,
Alex Kritikos
Software AG
_______________________________________________
paho-dev mailing list
paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev
