Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[paho-dev] Vote for Committer status for Andy Gelme was started by Scott de Deugd

technology.paho Committers,
This automatically generated message signals that Scott de Deugd has
nominated Andy Gelme as a Committer on the technology.paho project. The
reason given is as follows:

Andy Gelme has contributed an additional language (Lua) implementation of
the MQTT client protocol, which the Paho project team considers a
significant new contribution to the project. 

Andy has submitted the code via Bugzilla and has worked with the Eclipse
teams to secure preliminary approval for Parallel IP track via IPZilla. The
existing team has taken a look at the contribution, feels it is ready to
commit to the repository, and recommend committer status for Andy Gelme.

As this is a spec-conforming full implementation implementation, Andy has
said he intends to provide the support and necessary changes to this code
base through Eclipse. Andy is also working with a related Lua project in
Eclipse (Koneki) and there is already growing interest in using his

best regards........Scott


IPZilla Submission:

The vote is being held via the MyFoundation portal: voters *must* use the
portal for the votes to be properly recorded.  The voting will continue
until either all 4 existing Committers have voted or until they have been
given enough time to vote, even if they do not do so (defined as at least
one week). Andy Gelme must receive at least three +1s and no -1s for a
successful election.

Eligible Committers must cast their votes through their My Foundation
portal page (do NOT just reply to this email; your vote will not be
correctly recorded unless you use the portal):

The project Committers eligible to vote are:

    Ian Craggs
    Chad Kienle
    Dave Locke
    Scott de Deugd

*NOTE*: Successful elections are left open for a maximum of 120 days to
allow for processing of paperwork.  After that time the election will be
expired, regardless of its current status.  Should papework processing on
the part of the candidate take more time than allowed, a new election will
have to be held.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
lead, PMC member, or the EMO <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Back to the top