The ESF and Apps repositories were the
initial take and do not seem to fit anymore.
"tooling" is good but Chad
should weigh in on that too.
Also, we should see what Arlen thinks
as he is planning what I would call an application framework that spans
the client and the server, so we should be sure the new repository naming
fits with that.
Nicolas DEVERGE <ndeverge@xxxxxxxx>
discussions for paho project <paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
06/12/2012 09:39 AM
Paho repository structure
I totally agree with the following structures (I'd just
remove the "s"):
and for the Eurotech contribution, if they agree, I'd use org.eclipse.paho.tooling
instead of org.eclipse.paho.esf
Please feel free to debate here on the mailing list, and
over on the wiki itself.
- does it make sense to have MQTT client git repos moved
under an org.eclipse.paho.mqtt.clients.<language> structure?
- should the Eurotech tooling contribution be under .esf.
or should we find a better/more generic name and location - bearing in
mind the dependence on the Java client.