[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [p2-dev] Pack200 and Canonical Descriptor Issue
|
Are you sure it is valid? One example I see is:
<artifact classifier='osgi.bundle' id='org.eclipse.m2m.qvt.oml.common' version='2.1.0.v20091205-0148'>
<properties size='4'>
<property name='artifact.size' value='81755'/>
<property name='download.size' value='81755'/>
<property name='download.md5' value='bb7c21d7d912a5590d85d95f742f29e4'/>
<property name='download.contentType' value='application/zip'/>
</properties>
</artifact>
Which has no corresponding plugin jar. There are many of these for various bundles. Sorry, my links before were one level too low.
---------------------------------------------
Marcus Kestler
Advisory Software Engineer
IBM Rational Capilano Group
---------------------------------------------
Pascal Rapicault ---03/16/2010 11:56:46 AM---You are being lied to. p2 does not produce such repositories. Judging from previous discussions thro
![]()
From: | ![]()
Pascal Rapicault <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
To: | ![]()
P2 developer discussions <p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
Date: | ![]()
03/16/2010 11:56 AM |
![]()
Subject: | ![]()
Re: [p2-dev] Pack200 and Canonical Descriptor Issue |
![]()
Sent by: | ![]()
p2-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx |
You are being lied to. p2 does not produce such repositories. Judging from previous discussions through bug reports, I believe this results from the modeling build infrastructure that runs some a script of its own that strip out the canonical artifacts.
That said this repository seems to be valid.
On 2010-03-16, at 11:45 AM, Marcus R Kestler wrote:
_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev

