| Re: [ospo.zone] OSPO Alliance collaboration infrastructure |
Hello,
I would welcome all those changes as it would further strengthen the "OSPO Alliance" brand and ensure ownership of our working tools and data.
Choosing OpenCloud as the hosting platform is nice too, but we
must ensure it gets the proper credit (at a least a mention in
every page and document as a supporter or sponsor of the OA).
It could be interesting to have instances for mastodon/pletora as publish-only information feeds in to the Fediverse (no real users just a way to replicate the news and announcements from the site).
Further down the line, if you want to keep running working groups, we should consider having our won instance of a chat+pad+video platform (either matrix, rocket.chat, mattermost, zulip, etc.).
Best regards,
Hi, Equally enthusiastic on the overall approach ; It's just a short-term pain with huge longer term benefits. I would have one reserve however for the Gitea instance - appart from a few huge open source communities, it does not look common to me to host code outside of GitHub.com or GitLab.com - and doing so puts us a bit appart, and make forking the project less of an instant action. If we want to go independant from the Eclipe/OW2 instances, I would rather move to GitLab.com nico
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xBFB2489889C88BF7.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature