Batik issues are gone in
today’s build. It’s OK for the build R2. Thanks!
Xiaoying
From:
orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007
12:30 PM
To: Orbit
Developer discussion
Subject: Re: [orbit-dev] Orbit
build R2? Are we ready?
I'm set. We in WTP that is.
Appears "servlet.jsp" was also modified since
the last Recommended build.
Any other changes needed? Is more time needed? Such as
to investigate the Batik issues?
"Europa RC4 +2" is 6/21 .... so, I'd suggest
we target noon on 6/20 (today) unless there are objections?
9,10c9,10
<
plugin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,2.0.0=v200706111738,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/javax.servlet.jsp
< plugin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.source,2.0.0=v200706111738,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/javax.servlet.jsp/source-bundle
---
>
plugin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,2.0.0=v200706191603,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/javax.servlet.jsp
>
plugin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.source,2.0.0=v200706191603,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/javax.servlet.jsp/source-bundle
50,51c50,51
< plugin@org.apache.lucene.analysis,1.9.1=v200706111724,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/org.apache.lucene.analysis
<
plugin@org.apache.lucene.analysis.source,1.9.1=v200706111724,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/org.apache.lucene.analysis/source-bundle
---
>
plugin@org.apache.lucene.analysis,1.9.1=v200706181610,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/org.apache.lucene.analysis
>
plugin@org.apache.lucene.analysis.source,1.9.1=v200706181610,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/org.apache.lucene.analysis/source-bundle
160c160
<
plugin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=v200706111329,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/org.apache.axis
---
> plugin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=v200706191647,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/org.apache.axis
David M
Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
06/19/2007 01:13 AM
Please
respond to
Orbit Developer discussion
<orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To
|
Orbit Developer
discussion
<orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
Re: [orbit-dev] Orbit build
R2?
|
|
I should have mentioned, the Axis bugs I was talking about are
Orbit bug 188654 and bug 193254
And we're tracking WTP's use/inclusion with
bug 193256
I have changed the label of the 'committer builds' to be "R" for now,
but remember these
are not really Recommended builds until moved to the 'downloads' area.
I don't think there's any need to save or promote the recent I-builds, as they
have only been used to work out the IP Log issues, as far as I can tell.
I "diff'd" the map files from the first R-build, and the last
I-build, and only difference was the
lucene plugins.
< plugin@org.apache.lucene.analysis,1.9.1=v200706111724,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/org.apache.lucene.analysis
<
plugin@org.apache.lucene.analysis.source,1.9.1=v200706111724,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/org.apache.lucene.analysis/source-bundle
---
>
plugin@org.apache.lucene.analysis,1.9.1=v200706181610,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/org.apache.lucene.analysis
> plugin@org.apache.lucene.analysis.source,1.9.1=v200706181610,:pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/tools,,org.eclipse.orbit/org.apache.lucene.analysis/source-bundle
David M
Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
06/18/2007 11:52 PM
Please
respond to
Orbit Developer discussion
<orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To
|
Orbit Developer
discussion
<orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
Re: [orbit-dev] Orbit build
R2?
|
|
Well gee if we're going to do an R2 anyway ... there's some changes/fixes to
the Axis bundle I'd like to get in.
We should know for sure and be ready by Tuesday or Wednesday.
DJ Houghton
<DJ_Houghton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
06/18/2007 05:17 PM
Please
respond to
Orbit Developer discussion
<orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To
|
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
[orbit-dev] Orbit build R2?
|
|
Hey, we knew it was going to happen eventually,
right?
The Platform needs a new Orbit R-build to fix bug
193171. Basically it
looks like there is a bug which prevented the
right files from being
released to the org.apache.lucene.analysis
project. As a result, the
org.apache.lucene.analysis in the Orbit build
doesn't contain any class
files.
Unfortunately when I verified the contents of the
Orbit build before it was
promoted to R-status, I checked the existence of
the binary bundles and the
shape of the new source bundles since that is what
we changed, but not the
shape of the binary bundle.
I have entered bug 193203 against the Platform to
pick up the new version
of org.apache.lucene.analysis once its available.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev