Re: [orbit-dev] pre-built libraries

[Chris Aniszczyk <zx@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Are you referring to this fixed problem? https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=44512

Cheers,

---
Chris Aniszczyk | IBM Lotus | Eclipse Committer | http://mea-bloga.blogspot.com | +1 860 839 2465

Eugene Kuleshov ---02/01/2007 04:53:42 PM---There is an issue with project naming. Basically I can't have two

From:	Eugene Kuleshov <eu@xxxxxxxx>
To:	Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	02/01/2007 04:53 PM
Subject:	Re: [orbit-dev] pre-built libraries

---

  There is an issue with project naming. Basically I can't have two 
versions of the same bundle in my workspace (i.e. when two other 
projects have dependencies on different versions of the same framework)

  regards,
  Eugene


DJ Houghton wrote:
> As outlined in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=170088 and
> talked about on this list before, we need to determine how pre-built
> libraries live in the Orbit world.
>
> I propose we do the following: (I will use ICU 3.4.5 as an example)
> - create the com.ibm.icu project in the repository
> - create a v3_4_5 branch
> - put the JAR in the branch
> - add a GET entry to the map file (as per
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171869)
> - update the features, etc.
>
> David, does this sound ok or will this horribly break the build? (once the
> Get fetch factory is released into the builder, of course)
>
> Any other comments/objections from anyone else?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> orbit-dev mailing list
> orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
>   

_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev