[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[oaw-wg] Re: [oaw-dev] Re: Recipe Framework deprcated?
|
I think it is ok to have Recipe as a project of it's own under M2T. We
really should extract the code from M2T Xpand and make it a separate
project with a dedicated team of people taking care of it. This way we
can ensure it will be maintained.
Markus, as you have been involved with Recipe for a long time now, it
would be great if you could team up with Antony to create a project
proposal. I guess this way you will be able to gather some community
around Recipe, which is an important thing for a sustainable
development of a project.
Cheers, Peter
Sent from my iPhone
On 10.07.2009, at 22:45, Markus Voelter <voelter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I agree that it needs a major overhaul. I suggest either a
textual DSL to specify "code constraints" or an integration
with Findbugs and the like. We've planned on doing that, but
we don't get around to it.
However, I *strongly* disagree regarding it not belonging to
M2T. Since the purpose of it is that is checks the conformity
of manually written code to generated code and models, M2T
clearly is the place for it.
Markus
Sven Efftinge wrote:
In addition I think it does not belong to M2T, because it is not
directly about model to text transformation.
So, if people think it is useful and want to support it I guess
it's best to find a new home.
Sven
On Jul 10, 2009, at 9:02 PM, Karsten Thoms wrote:
Hi Andre!
Regarding Recipe it is a bit unclear. The codebase is in Eclipse
M2T Xpand migrated, and Antony Wilkins is willing to contribute.
So if this component is maintained by someone nothing speaks
against having it further in oAW5. I hoped that it would be
deprecated, since no one seemed to use it and no one was willing
to develop it further.
~Karsten
Am 10.07.2009 um 17:07 schrieb André Arnold:
Hi all,
are the Recipe framework and PLE really deprecated? Am I right,
that we just
deprecated UML classic and decided to not include PLE and
Recipe into oAW5 but might include it into oAW 5.5 or whatever we
call it. Is
that view correct?
Cheers,
André
--
Markus Völter
voelter - ingenieurbüro für softwaretechnologie/itemis
Ötztaler Strasse 38, 70327 Stuttgart-Untertürkheim, Germany
Tel. +49 (0) 171 / 86 01 869
Email: voelter@xxxxxxx
Web: http://www.voelter.de
Blog: http://www.voelter.de/blog
SE Radio Podcast: http://www.se-radio.net
omega tau podcast: http://www.omegataupodcast.net
