Stephanie,
It's an interesting question.
Certainly the currently partial restructuring is confusing.
E.g., what's the difference between these two:
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.emf
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.emf.emf
But there are pages like this still:
https://www.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/
Though I'm not sure how you get there from the modeling home page:
https://www.eclipse.org/modeling/
I'm sure that projects using the EMFT
forum will continue to want to use it. Forum history is an
important resource.
Restructuring the modeling project infrastructure further is
likely significant work for everyone involved, and I fear it will
be hard to get everyone involved who needs to be involved.
I'm interested in the opinions of others, including not just other
PMC leads but also project leads.
Cheers,
Ed
On 22.02.2017 20:55, Stephanie wrote:
Hi Modeling-PMC,
I would like some feedback as to whether or not restructuring
the sub-projects under modeling is worth the time and effort.
Per the Modeling Top-level project restructuring review in
2012, several container projects (MDT, GMT, GMP, etc) were
suppose to be eliminated. This transition has not yet been
successful, and I would like to know if the PMC thinks it is
beneficial to move all of sub-projects under the modeling
umbrella or if we should just leave them as is.
Please give me your feedback as soon as possible, it is greatly
appreciated!
Cheers,
Stephanie
--
Stephanie Swart on behalf of the Eclipse
Management Organization
Project Coordinator- Memberships and Open Source Projects
Eclipse Foundation
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
