Hi,
may be +1 for Papyrus is missing expect if I missed something on my side.
Thanks,
Sébastien.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sébastien Gérard
+33 (0)1 69 08 58 24 / +33(0)6 88 20 00 47
CEA Saclay Nano-INNOV
Institut CARNOT CEA LIST
DILS/Laboratoire
d’Ingénierie dirigée par les modèles pour les Systèmes Embarqués (LISE),
Point Courrier n°174
91 191 Gif sur Yvette CEDEX
www.eclipse.org/papyrus
De : modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Ed Merks
Envoyé : jeudi 6 juin 2013 07:56
À : PMC members mailing list; Wayne Beaton
Objet : [modeling-pmc] Fwd: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler projects that are missing something that's required for the review
Wayne/PMC,
Certainly I've approved OCL already. As I look down the list it seems to me I've reviewed most if not all the modeling projects I see on your list. What's needed at this point to ensure that all the things I've already approved are removed from this list?
Were the project owners supposed to forward my review to you, add a link to the approval to their bugzilla, or something else?
I've also submitted reviews for EMF and XSD, but I've not approved my own submissions; that seems somehow wrong. Is it necessary for some other PMC member to give a +1 for my two projects, or can I do that myself? The latter pretty much implies that anything
I submit myself is implicitly approved. Perhaps some other PMC member would be so kind as to approve EMF and XSD...
Regards,
Ed
-------- Original Message --------
Hi Wayne
I don't think MDT/OCL should be on the list, so I reviewed the Bug 406441 dependencies. It appears that the only projects that satisfy you are ones where you have added the PMC approval yourself.
All other projects have a problem at the PMC stage. So it seems that either you or the PMC are failing to complete the approval by updating Bugzillas in response to the approval grant on the PMC mailing list.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 05.06.2013 23:21, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Greetings folks.
I've built a little Bugzilla query that lists the projects that are missing something that I require for the review.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?v4=Approved%20IP%20Log&bug_status=NEW&o5=substring&n2=1&f1=blocked&o3=substring&v3=Documentation&o1=equals&f4=attachments.description&v5=pmc_approved&query_format=advanced&f3=keywords&o4=equals&f2=OP&f5=flagtypes.name&v1=406441&list_id=5794737
If your project is on this list, you're missing one of three things:
* Review documentation;
* PMC approval of review documentation; or
* An IP Team-approved IP Log.
The corresponding records for projects that are doing service releases should already be marked as FIXED and so should not be on this list.
If you believe that your project should not be on this list, let me know. We juggle a lot of balls with these releases and it's easy to miss something.
If you're not on this list, you should be included in the "upcoming reviews" section of the Projects Gateway page:
http://eclipse.org/projects/
Let me know if you're missing.
If I'm waiting on you to submit your IP Log, or provide me with PMC-approved review documentation, please provide it ASAP. This was due today. The review starts tomorrow; if I don't have your materials in my inbox tomorrow AM, then you miss the review. If you've
submitted your review documentation and your IP Log, but the IP Log hasn't come back, I'll schedule you for the review anyway (the review cannot be declared successful until after the IP Log is approved).
I do not intend to hold a call for this review. If anybody feels strongly in favour of holding a call, let me know.
If you're having trouble meeting any of the requirements, please let me know.
My thanks go out to the projects that paid attention and heeded the deadlines.
Wayne
|