Hi Wayne
Yes.
But emft should be treated as a container project (e.g.tmf), not a
support folder (e.g. build).
m2m has already migrated to mmt, so:
- m2m could be discarded
- m2m could be kept as the modeling/m2m sub-folder
- m2m could be migrated as a live m2m container project (clashing
with machine-to-machine)
your/Ed Merks' choice. I favour keeping it as modeling/m2m so that
it appears in GIT but doesn't
have a new clashing repo that is stale before it's even created.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 12/12/2012 15:42, Wayne Beaton wrote:
As Ed stated, /modeling/amalgam and /modeling/mdt have been
migrated in place (i.e.
/gitroot/www.eclipse.org/modeling/amalgam.git and
/gitroot/www.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt.git).
/modeling/gmt has been migrated to
/gitroot/www.eclipse.org/gmt.git. We can ask webmaster to set up a
redirect from /modeling/gmt to /gmt.
Each of these subdirectories is owned by a particular modeling
subproject. Each of these should be migrated to
/gitroot/www.eclipse.org/modeling/*.git (e.g.
/gitroot/www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf.git) with the same group
ownership.
drwxrwsr-x+ 24 nickb modeling.emf.emf 4096 2012-05-29 09:37
emf
drwxrwsr-x+ 2 ahunter modeling.gmp 4096 2010-05-21 10:12
gmf
drwxrwsr-x+ 20 8301 modeling.gmp 4096 2011-01-27 11:37
gmp
drwxrwsr-x+ 11 nickb modeling.mmt 4096 2010-11-09 08:34
m2m
drwxrwsr-x+ 19 nickb modeling.m2t 4096 2012-01-31 04:35
m2t
drwxrwsr-x+ 2 ewillink modeling.mmt 4096 2012-05-14 16:17
mmt
drwxrwsr-x+ 12 sefftinge modeling.tmf 4096 2011-03-10 05:57
tmf
This is left over from a previous termination and can just be
removed
drwxrwsr-x+ 4 mward root 4096 2012-03-26
16:20 mddi
I don't know what this is, but I think it needs to just go.
drwxrwsr-x+ 2 nickb modeling 4096 2008-04-26
03:34 yeportal
Which leaves all of these directories. These are all currently
owned by the Modeling top-level project so I believe that they
should all just be migrated to
/gitroot/www.eclipse.org/modeling.git after pruning out all of the
above
drwxrwsr-x+ 3 nickb modeling 4096 2011-01-26
15:25 build
-r--rwxr--+ 1 mtaal modeling 3457 2009-03-31 17:05
download.php,v
drwxrwsr-x+ 3 nickb modeling 4096 2009-09-28 16:41
downloads
drwxrwsr-x+ 31 nickb modeling 4096 2012-11-23 15:45
emft
drwxrwsr-x+ 4 8301 modeling 4096 2009-01-02 00:17
images
drwxrwsr-x+ 3 emerks modeling 4096 2012-11-13 07:30
includes
-r--rwxr--+ 1 cbrun modeling 54569 2012-03-09 11:38
index.php,v
-r--rwxr--+ 1 mtaal modeling 16257 2009-03-31 17:05
modeling-charter.php,v
drwxrwsr-x+ 3 8301 modeling 4096 2007-10-14 08:13
presentations
-r--rwxr--+ 1 mtaal modeling 731 2009-03-31 17:05
searchcvs.php,v
drwxrwsr-x+ 2 nickb modeling 4096 2008-01-04 15:24
team
drwxrwsr-x+ 5 emerks modeling 4096 2010-06-02
14:49 updates
-r--rwxr--+ 1 mward root 9043 2011-01-26 15:18
_projectCommon.php,v
drwxrwsr-x+ 3 mward root 4096 2008-11-14 09:05
project-info
Does this make sense?
Wayne
On 12/12/2012 02:32 AM, Ed Merks wrote:
Ed,
I'm discussing with Wayne what needs to happen to end up with a
reasonable/worksable non-CVS interim result from which we can
migrate to a more sensible final structure.
Regards,
Ed
On 10/12/2012 8:17 AM, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
Ping. What is happening on this?
[For MMT it transpired that a partial flattening had been
exploited so that while MMT was not nested in modeling, it
still depends on the root modeling scripts.]
Regards
Ed Willink
On 04/12/2012 17:03, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
What is happening about this?
So far we have only two container project GITs.
www.eclipse.org/modeling/amalgam.git
www.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt.git
serving BPMN2, Modisco, OCL, Papyrus, UML2 and others
For MDT to work after CVS shutdown, we need a www.eclipse.org/modeling.git
trimmed to at least the root and common folders such as
build, downloads, images, includes, project-info ...
probably every folder that isn't for a 'container' project.
I'll request a www.eclipse.org/modeling/mmt.git
in accordance with Kenn's preference that container projects
take GIT responsibility for their sub-projects.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 01/12/2012 15:27, Kenn Hussey wrote:
Given that a git repository has already been
set up for MDT web content, my preference would be the
latter.
Kenn
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Ed Willink <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I suggest that the modeling project as a whole
should request either a single GIT repo for
www/modeling/..., or give detailed instructions on
how www/modeling in CVS should be parceled up into
non-overlapping per project GIT repo's.
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2793 / Virus Database: 2634/5928 -
Release Date: 11/30/12
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
No virus
found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2805 / Virus Database: 2634/5951 - Release Date:
12/11/12
|
