Rich,
I think you could have a quick idea if you have a look to the IP Log
for the MDT project:
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/ip_log.php?projectid=modeling.mdt
Cheers,
Adolfo.
Richard Gronback escribió:
I suggest that each proposed committer present a list of contributions they
have made to MDT OCL, in order for each to be evaluated on the meritocratic
basis upon which Eclipse projects operate.
Thanks,
Rich
On 3/16/09 11:04 AM, "Freddy Allilaire" <freddy.allilaire@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Ed,
Here is the proposed set of committers for MDT/OCL subproject
lead : Freddy Allilaire
committers :
Anthony Hunter
Bernd Kolb
another SAP guy ;-)
Laurent Goubet
Bernd : we'll soon need the "SAP guy" name ;-)
Regards,
Freddy
Ed Merks a écrit :
Guys,
I've asked the EMO about how to handle this and they are fine if we
simply identify for each component a new set of committers. So I'll
expect to see a proposed set of committers, including a lead, for each
component *by the end of next week*, and then I'll go forward with
that list.
Cheers,
Ed
Anthony Hunter wrote:
So Christian, are you willing to baby sit the components on your own
time until a termination review?
Or would you rather vote in a some committers on each of these
components to take over next week, with the provision that things
could change based on the to be scheduled termination review?
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GEF / GMF / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-270-4613
Inactive hide details for "Christian W. Damus" ---03/12/2009 10:16:29
AM---Hi, Kenn, Thanks for your prompt input. That has be"Christian W.
Damus" ---03/12/2009 10:16:29 AM---Hi, Kenn, Thanks for your prompt
input. That has been my understanding, too.
From:
"Christian W. Damus" <give.a.damus@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
03/12/2009 10:16 AM
Subject:
[modeling-pmc] Re: [emf-dev] Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] Transition Plan for
MDT OCL and EMF"QTV" Components?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi, Kenn,
Thanks for your prompt input. That has been my understanding, too.
Perhaps the name of this review mechanism is problematic: it should
be called the
"Please-help-Eclipse-to-decide-what-to-do-with-this-project Review." :-)
I shall work up some slides, then, for termination reviews of these
components and send them out for feed-back before asking the EMO to
schedule the reviews. These slides will make it clear that there is,
in my opinion, sufficient interest to re-boot these components with
new committers under new leadership and that this should be the
recommended course of action. As I understand it, the interested
parties will have an opportunity to collaborate on the new road-map,
committer team, and leadership for these components.
Thanks!
Christian
On 12-Mar-09, at 8:50 AM, Kenn Hussey wrote:
Christian,
The process for ³vaulting of individuals into committer
positions² IS the Termination Review, AFAIK. To be clear,
a Termination Review does not automatically mean the
project/component will be terminated/archived; it gives
the community the chance to step up and potentially do a
reboot. I don¹t think we can/should replace all of the
committers (only one in this case) with new ones via the
usual voting process unless we can justify the new
committers based on meritocracyŠ
Cheers,
*Kenn Hussey
Program Manager, Modeling and Design Solutions*
*<image001.jpg>* <http://www.embarcadero.com/>
*Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. | **www.embarcadero.com*
<http://www.embarcadero.com/>*
82 Peter Street, Second Floor | Toronto, ON M5V 2G5*_
_*Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*
<mailto:Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*
Office: 416-593-1585 x9296 Mobile: 613-301-9105*
*From:* _emf-dev-bounces@eclipse.org_
<mailto:emf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[_mailto:emf-dev-bounces@eclipse.org_] *On Behalf Of
*Christian W.Damus*
Sent:* Thursday, March 12, 2009 8:40 AM*
To:* PMC members mailing list*
Cc:* MDT OCL mailing list; Eclipse Modelling Framework*
Subject:* [emf-dev] Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] Transition Plan for
MDT OCL and EMF"QTV" Components?
Hi,
Thanks to Anthony, Cédric, and Bernd for expressing
willingness to commit to the continued vitality of these
components! It's great to see such support.
Just to be clear, again: as I understand it, Termination
Review is the only process by which a project's committer
team might be changed /en masse/ on events such as this,
and the preferred outcome for all stakeholders is always
that the project continue under new leadership with a new
committer team.
If there is another mechanism available, or if the
Modeling PMC can direct a transition, please let me know!
I prefer a smooth transition of these components into
willing and capable hands. For example, if the PMC can
approve the vaulting of individuals into committer
positions that they would not, under normal
circumstances, yet have earned, then that works for me.
Kenn? Ed? What is your recommendation as PMC reps for the
projects involved?
Thanks,
Christian
On 11-Mar-09, at 5:30 PM, Christian W. Damus wrote:
Hello, my PMC,
As most of you already know, I have been unemployed for
some time now. That interval is now coming to an end, to
my great relief.
However, in my new employment, the job description does
not include time to spend on development of the Eclipse
Modeling components on which I am currently a committer.
Nor would I expect it to, as the work is quite removed
from the MDD sphere.
I would not be able to contribute as a committer on these
components to the standard expected of the Eclipse
community, and certainly not my own standard, on my own
personal time. Therefore, I shall need to relinquish my
committer rights on the MDT OCL component and the EMF
Query, Transaction, and Validation components as of next
week.
The problem is, of course, that I am the only committer
on these components. As I understand the Eclipse process,
a Project that finds itself without any committers
proceeds to Termination Review in the hope that the
project can be re-staffed. Is the same true of
Components? Can we assume that the rules of the new
process (in which these components that are still
Components would be Projects) should apply?
Please advise.
Thanks,
Christian
_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list_
__mdt-ocl.dev@eclipse.org_ <mailto:mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>_
__https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev_
_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list_
__mdt-ocl.dev@eclipse.org_ <mailto:mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>_
__https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev_
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
--
|
Adolfo
Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera
adolfosbh(at)opencanarias(dot)com
C/Elías Ramos González, 4, ofc. 304
38001 SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE
Tel.: +34 922 240231 / +34 617 718268 |
|
