Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] feedback on GMT web site

I agree with you.
I also agree that we have to improve much the organization of GMT.
For oAW matters, I will transmit these remarks to Markus Voelter.
I will discuss with him directly next week at OOPSLA because
he will be there.
Bjorn, will you be at OOPSLA and if yes would it be possible
to have a short meeting with Markus to stress the importance
of what has been said?
Best regards,

On 10/19/07, Ed Merks <merks@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'll draw Nick's attention to that link gone astray...

I agree with you.  As the various parts of the oAW technology are
incorporated into the other projects, like Xpand into M2T and MWE into
EMFT, I'll ask folks to avoid any non-Eclipse branding on the site.  You
won't find IBM/Rational branding nor Borland branding at Eclipse, so we
ought not be to seeing anything that isn't part of Eclipse's branding.
We'll queue up this topic for discussion at the next PMC meeting.

It would be good to improve GMT's image as well.  What are your thoughts on
this Jean?

Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265  (t/l 969)

            "Ian Skerrett"
            < ian.skerrett@ecl
  >                                                  To
            Sent by:                  <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx >
            modeling-pmc-boun                                          cc
            ces@xxxxxxxxxxx           "'Bjorn Freeman-Benson'"
                                      < bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
            10/19/2007 12:06          [modeling-pmc] feedback on GMT web
            PM                        site

            Please respond to
   ; Please
               respond to
               PMC members
              mailing list

Modeling PMC,

Today, I was looking at the open Achitectureware project and in general the
GMT project.   I don?t usually provide feedback on project specific
branding and marketing but I thought compelled to do so in this case.

IMHO, from a branding and marketing perspective, the open Architectureware
project looks out of place in the context of the Eclipse community.   They
essentially look like they have parachuted in their existing project into
an Eclipse project web page.  They actually also seem to have another
project web site  I find it all very
confusing and probably detrimental to the Eclipse brand.

If I look at the GMT site, it seems like the open architectureware scenario
plays out again and again.   I see lots of project logos and cool names
that seem to have very little to do with Eclipse?  The perception I am left
with is that GMT is hovering up existing modeling projects but not really
integrating them into Eclipse?  I think what you are doing is creating an
incubator for new modeling projects, which is great, but in my opinion what
you are communicating is something very different and will hurt the
perception of the overall modeling project.

As I said, I usually don?t provide this type of feedback but in this case I
just had to say something.   I?d be happy to discuss further and if you

Btw, when I went to try to find the PMC mailing list, the link on this page points to


Ian Skerrett
Director of Marketing
Eclipse Foundation
613-224-9461 ext. 227
modeling-pmc mailing list

modeling-pmc mailing list

Jean Bézivin - ATLAS Group (INRIA & LINA) - University of Nantes - 2, rue de la Houssinière
44322 Nantes cedex 3 - France
tel. +33 2 51 12 58 13 - fax. +33 2 51 12 58 12 - cell.+33 6 14 32 22 36
- e.mail: Jean.Bezivin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - Skype: jbezivin

Back to the top