[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] Call summary - 17 July 2007
|
Rich,
My one and only concern would be that someone taking maternity leave ought
to be exempt while on leave.
Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265 (t/l 969)
Richard Gronback
<richard.gronback
@borland.com> To
Sent by: PMC members mailing list
modeling-pmc-boun <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
ces@xxxxxxxxxxx cc
Subject
07/17/2007 11:34 Re: [modeling-pmc] Call summary -
AM 17 July 2007
Please respond to
PMC members
mailing list
<modeling-pmc@ecl
ipse.org>
Please review: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Modeling_Project_Committer_Policies
I modified it a bit from the WTP one, per our discussion on the call.
Thanks,
Rich
On 7/17/07 4:43 PM, "Richard Gronback" <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hello,
Apologies for the poor quality audio on today?s call. I?ve copied
Bjorn to let him know right away that we found the Asterisk
Conference Call service to be largely unusable. In particular, we
had trouble communicating with Jean in France, who was the one we
were most hoping to accommodate by using the service. Also, we had a
bad echo and fading. I?m sure there are some tips/tricks we need to
take advantage of, if we decide to use it again. Bjorn, have others
had success with it?
A summary of each point from our agenda:
Most agreed the basic policy for Committer removal followed by
WebTools is appropriate for our use in Modeling. Rich will
create a Wiki with the policy for review by the PMC.
Ganymede: we?ll at least do as much as we did for Europa, and
continue toward common build infrastructure, etc. We may also
want to have a Modeling package added to EPP, and do what we
can to at least appear more unified/integrated. Rich will
update the Modeling plan for Ganymede.
Most agreed that there is not likely to be much gained by
having the Foundation vote on OMG matters on our behalf, as
most contributors to Modeling are members and vote anyway. On
the topic of coordinating with the modeldriven.org folks, we?ll
look to meet with them at ESE, if not before (Jean might have
proposed something else, but it was too hard to hear him).
By the time we got to the Declarative QVT component proposal, I
believe it was down to just Ed and I on the ?call?. Neither of
us see any issues with the proposal, consider Compuware to have
resigned from the component, and are happy to have it picked up
by another team.
Please comment on this summary with anything I?ve forgotten or got
wrong.
Thanks,
Rich
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc