|
Hello all,
I apologize for not making this call. I experienced
technical
difficulties with the teleconference
service and I could not find a way
to
connect.
I wanted to let you know that I would not be able to
coordinate the
MDDi project in the future.
I am strongly involved in other activities
at
Thales and my company considers to stop our activities
in MDDi for the
moment.
I have had a discussion with other committers for a
couple of weeks
on the MDDi mailing list
(http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mddi-dev/msg00042.html).
Xavier
Blanc
(LIP6) volunteered
to take the project lead and all the other committers
accepted this
proposal.
I wanted to let you know and to
ask you about the process in this kind of situation.
Thanks,
Sébastien
Richard Gronback a écrit :
Call summary - 17 July 2007
Hello,
Apologies for the poor quality audio on today’s call. I’ve copied
Bjorn to let him know right away that we found the Asterisk Conference
Call service to be largely unusable. In particular, we had trouble
communicating with Jean in France, who was the one we were most hoping
to accommodate by using the service. Also, we had a bad echo and
fading. I’m sure there are some tips/tricks we need to take advantage
of, if we decide to use it again. Bjorn, have others had success with
it?
A summary of each point from our agenda:
- Most agreed the basic policy for Committer
removal followed by WebTools is appropriate for our use in Modeling.
Rich will create a Wiki with the policy for review by the PMC.
- Ganymede: we’ll at least do as much as we did
for Europa, and continue toward common build infrastructure, etc. We
may also want to have a Modeling package added to EPP, and do what we
can to at least appear more unified/integrated. Rich will update the
Modeling plan for Ganymede.
- Most agreed that there is not likely to be
much gained by having the Foundation vote on OMG matters on our behalf,
as most contributors to Modeling are members and vote anyway. On the
topic of coordinating with the modeldriven.org folks, we’ll look to
meet with them at ESE, if not before (Jean might have proposed
something else, but it was too hard to hear him).
- By the time we got to the Declarative QVT
component proposal, I believe it was down to just Ed and I on the
“call”. Neither of us see any issues with the proposal, consider
Compuware to have resigned from the component, and are happy to have it
picked up by another team.
Please comment on this summary with anything I’ve forgotten or got
wrong.
Thanks,
Rich
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
|
