Your ethics are intact, assuming that the contribution actually
ended up in the project's repository :-)
Can you open a bug against "Community/IP Log Tool" regarding the
size mismatch?
Wayne
On 06/05/2012 04:31 PM, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi Wayne
The Portal seems to have moved on a step so that I am now a
committer, so we just need to sort out the IP.
As instructed, I have marked the attachments as iplog+, although
I'm not quite sure of the ethics of adjusting my own historic IP
contributions.
Running the IP log shows the extra Bug, but as 12877 bytes, rather
than the 1.47 MB zipped size/ 3.8MB unzipped (isn't autogeneration
bloat wonderful).
Regards
Ed Willink
On 05/06/2012 20:45, Wayne Beaton wrote:
It's not bookkeeping detail. Committer elections, like
everything else, need to be done in an open and transparent
manner. Part of this is an transparent demonstration of merit
when nominating a new committer.
That part was omitted. I added it.
The election was sidetracked, but I brought it back on track.
The IP Log issue is separate and needs to be addressed.
Wayne
On 06/05/2012 02:50 PM, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi Wayne
I think this has got very confused. The election seems to be
side tracked by some bookkeeping detail.
Who do you think should do what?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 05/06/2012 19:43, Wayne Beaton wrote:
I got my list off the IP Log.
This one is not represented because nothing in the bug is
marked iplog+. One or more of the attachments needs to be so
marked. And then you should probably respin the IP Log :-)
Wayne
On 06/05/2012 02:24 AM, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi Wayne
You missed my main contribution
Bug 236128
- QVT Operational Models Contribution from
UMLX
which provides 11 of the 30 plugins in QVTo's CVS.
These debugged the models from the OMG QVT 1.0
specification and in conjunction with the models in the
QVTd project became the basis for the OMG QVT 1.1
specification. However, my understanding is that Borland
were using a pragmatic version of the models and so
migration to my contribution remains a plan.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 04/06/2012 22:09, Wayne Beaton wrote:
A committer nomination must include some
discussion of the individual's contributions to the
project.
Minimally, this tends to be a list of high-quality (i.e.
accepted) patches contributed by the individual. In Ed's
case, you should have cited the following:
Bug 248862 EBoolean features without defaults are not
serialised when false Unit tests updates
Bug 253970 platform: references from AST are
restrictive Fix for platform: serialisation
Bug 262443 QVT OML Model updates for M5 Cumulative patch
for M5 problems
FWIW, with this message, I have provided the
demonstration of merit and the election can, IHMO,
continue. The PMC may have a different opinion (and
theirs is the one that matters).
Wayne
On 06/03/2012 05:41 AM, portal on behalf of Radomil
Dvorak wrote:
modeling.mmt.qvt-oml Committers,
This automatically generated message signals that Radomil Dvorak has
nominated Ed Willink as a Committer on the modeling.mmt.qvt-oml project.
The reason given is as follows:
Ed Willink has expressed interest in getting committer status on QVTo
The vote is being held via the MyFoundation portal: voters *must* use the
portal for the votes to be properly recorded. The voting will continue
until either all 3 existing Committers have voted or until they have been
given enough time to vote, even if they do not do so (defined as at least
one week). Because there are three or fewer existing Committers, they must
all vote and vote +1 for a successful election.
Eligible Committers must cast their votes through their My Foundation
portal page (do NOT just reply to this email; your vote will not be
correctly recorded unless you use the portal):
http://portal.eclipse.org/
The project Committers eligible to vote are:
Sergey Boyko
Radomil Dvorak
Aleksandr Igdalov
*NOTE*: Successful elections are left open for a maximum of 120 days to
allow for processing of paperwork. After that time the election will be
expired, regardless of its current status. Should papework processing on
the part of the candidate take more time than allowed, a new election will
have to be held.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
lead, PMC member, or the EMO <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
mmt-dev mailing list
mmt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mmt-dev
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse
Projects
_______________________________________________
mmt-dev mailing list
mmt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mmt-dev
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5044 -
Release Date: 06/04/12
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse ProjectsNo virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2433/5048 - Release
Date: 06/05/12
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse ProjectsNo virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2433/5048 - Release
Date: 06/05/12
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse
Projects |
