Hi Wayne
I think this has got very confused. The election seems to be side
tracked by some bookkeeping detail.
Who do you think should do what?
Regards
Ed Willink
On 05/06/2012 19:43, Wayne Beaton wrote:
I got my list off the IP Log.
This one is not represented because nothing in the bug is marked
iplog+. One or more of the attachments needs to be so marked. And
then you should probably respin the IP Log :-)
Wayne
On 06/05/2012 02:24 AM, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi Wayne
You missed my main contribution
Bug 236128
- QVT Operational Models Contribution from UMLX
which provides 11 of the 30 plugins in QVTo's CVS.
These debugged the models from the OMG QVT 1.0 specification and
in conjunction with the models in the QVTd project became the
basis for the OMG QVT 1.1 specification. However, my
understanding is that Borland were using a pragmatic version of
the models and so migration to my contribution remains a plan.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 04/06/2012 22:09, Wayne Beaton wrote:
A committer nomination must include some discussion of the
individual's contributions to the project.
Minimally, this tends to be a list of high-quality (i.e.
accepted) patches contributed by the individual. In Ed's case,
you should have cited the following:
Bug 248862 EBoolean features without defaults are not
serialised when false Unit tests updates
Bug 253970 platform: references from AST are restrictive Fix
for platform: serialisation
Bug 262443 QVT OML Model updates for M5 Cumulative patch for
M5 problems
FWIW, with this message, I have provided the demonstration of
merit and the election can, IHMO, continue. The PMC may have a
different opinion (and theirs is the one that matters).
Wayne
On 06/03/2012 05:41 AM, portal on behalf of Radomil Dvorak
wrote:
modeling.mmt.qvt-oml Committers,
This automatically generated message signals that Radomil Dvorak has
nominated Ed Willink as a Committer on the modeling.mmt.qvt-oml project.
The reason given is as follows:
Ed Willink has expressed interest in getting committer status on QVTo
The vote is being held via the MyFoundation portal: voters *must* use the
portal for the votes to be properly recorded. The voting will continue
until either all 3 existing Committers have voted or until they have been
given enough time to vote, even if they do not do so (defined as at least
one week). Because there are three or fewer existing Committers, they must
all vote and vote +1 for a successful election.
Eligible Committers must cast their votes through their My Foundation
portal page (do NOT just reply to this email; your vote will not be
correctly recorded unless you use the portal):
http://portal.eclipse.org/
The project Committers eligible to vote are:
Sergey Boyko
Radomil Dvorak
Aleksandr Igdalov
*NOTE*: Successful elections are left open for a maximum of 120 days to
allow for processing of paperwork. After that time the election will be
expired, regardless of its current status. Should papework processing on
the part of the candidate take more time than allowed, a new election will
have to be held.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
lead, PMC member, or the EMO <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
mmt-dev mailing list
mmt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mmt-dev
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse Projects
_______________________________________________
mmt-dev mailing list
mmt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mmt-dev
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5044 - Release
Date: 06/04/12
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse ProjectsNo virus
found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2433/5048 - Release Date:
06/05/12
|
