[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [microprofile-wg] DISCUSSION Thread: MicroProfile dependency on Jakarta EE (tight or loose)
|
Added some very minor comments. I think it's thorough enough
already for people to make a decision.
On 3/1/2023 6:23 PM, Emily Jiang via
microprofile-wg wrote:
After some lengthy discussion regarding the issue David
raised in this thread that MicroProfile 7.0 is trying to
solve, we revealed
this
googledoc containing some proposals in
yesterday's MicroProfile technical
call. There are 4 proposals listed with cons/pros
included.
For Proposal 4: Making the MicroProfile a profile of Jakarta EE,
the group felt that there was a prerequisite to dissolve
MicroProfile working group. This might not be feasible to
release MicroProfile 7.0 in June 2023. With this in mind, the
group felt it might be better for us to focus on Option 1, 2
and 3 and discuss further in the next few days till Tuesday
next week. At the MicroProfile Live Hangout, we can decide
whether we need further discussion or put up for a vote on
Option 1, 2 or 3 among MicroProfile Working Members.
Proposal 1: MicroProfile releases support a minimum Jakarta EE versions
Proposal 2: Create MicroProfile Lite and rename the current umbrella to MicroProfile Full
Proposal 3: Release new MicroProfile versions when new Jakarta EE/Java SE versions are released
I understand not everyone was in yesterday's call. Please
use this thread to share your thoughts.
Alternatively, please comment on the cons/pros of each
individual proposal.
Thanks
Emily
Thank you Arjan! Your proposal was added to the
doc. We will
continue the discussion of MicroProfile 7.0 next Tuesday.
On Wednesday, February
8, 2023 at 3:47:44 PM UTC Arjan Tijms wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at
6:09:14 PM UTC+1 Emily Jiang wrote:
As promised, I have created
this googledoc to
capture and log some comments for this
conversation.
Thanks for creating the document Emily.
Could you also add my proposal of making the
Micro Profile a profile of Jakarta EE to the
document as proposal 4?
I know some of you may think it's a peculiar
proposal, but I would like to ask those people to do
the following thought experiment:
"If the micro profile didn't exist yet, and
today, given the situation of how Jakarta EE is at
Eclipse and everything, we would talk about adding
a micro profile and associated new APIs. Would you
then wanted to create a new working group for this
new micro profile, or would you add it as a
profile to Jakarta EE?"
My guess is you already know the answer to this,
but truthfully for yourself, go through this mental
exercise. It may also help to think about why we
didn't create new or separate working groups for the
core profile last year and for the web profile after
it was transferred.
Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "MicroProfile" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
from it, send an email to microprofile+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/microprofile/76c6bc40-0d81-4dda-a62f-bd9591ed6a84n%40googlegroups.com.
--
_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg