Re: [microprofile-wg] : Re: Context Propagation 1.3 Specification Releas

["Kevin Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Nathan!


---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter 
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)



From:
       Nathan
Rauh/Rochester/IBM
To:
       "Microprofile
WG discussions" <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:
       "microprofile-wg"
<microprofile-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Kevin Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       11/12/2021
14:43
Subject:
       Re:
[microprofile-wg] [External] : Re: Context Propagation 1.3 Specification
Release Review - VOTE by November 18th - (two weeks)

---

It needs to be
withdrawn. The EMO wants the license file included in the TCK JavaDoc jar.
From checking
previous releases, it appears most other MicroProfile specs also had the
same issue with the missing license in the TCK JavaDoc jar file, but they
have all corrected it in the latest release for MP 5. MicroProfile Context
Propagation missed out on that effort and still needs an update to include
the license file, which I'm looking into now.





From:
       "Ed
Bratt" <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
       "Microprofile
WG discussions" <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Kevin Sutter"
<sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       11/12/2021
02:16 PM
Subject:
       Re:
[microprofile-wg] [External] : Re: Context Propagation 1.3 Specification
Release Review - VOTE by November 18th - (two weeks)
Sent
by:        "microprofile-wg"
<microprofile-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---

Hi, Could someone confirm
if this is going to be withdrawn and the ballot restarted. I think, based
on lack of any license we might need to vote against this when otherwise,
we'd be positive on the specification. Just to be clear, this is not ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is
>From an External Sender

This message came from outside your organization.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Hi,
Could someone confirm if this is going
to be withdrawn and the ballot restarted. I think, based on lack of any
license we might need to vote against this when otherwise, we'd be positive
on the specification. Just to be clear, this is not Oracle's vote on this
specification -- just my attempt to clear up the questions raised by Kevin.
Thanks
-- Ed
On 11/11/2021 9:53 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
I almost missed
this one since it didn't have [BALLOT] in the Subject line.  Please
remember to do that in the future.  Thanks!

Also, not quite ready to vote yet since I found that the TCK Javadoc Jar
file didn't containany
license file.
 Not sure if this requires a respin or not.  I've asked Nathan
to follow up with EMO.

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter 
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx    Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)



From:        "Emily
Jiang via microprofile-wg" <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        "Microprofile
WG discussions" <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:        "Emily
Jiang" <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        11/04/2021
17:28
Subject:        [EXTERNAL]
[microprofile-wg] Context Propagation 1.3 Specification Release Review
- VOTE by November 18th - (two weeks)
Sent by:        "microprofile-wg"
<microprofile-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---

To approve and ratify the Release Review of MicroProfile Context Propagation
1.3 Specification, the Steering Committee Representatives vote is requested.
Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any
feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

The MicroProfile Specification Process requires the Specification Committee
and the Community to provide feedback during the approval process using
the relevant documents:

https://github.com/microprofile/microprofile-wg/issues/106

This ballot will be fourteen days, ending on Thursday, Nov. 18th.  The
ballot requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Steering Committee
members.  There is no veto. Community input and Community votes are
welcomed. However, only the votes delivered by Steering Committee Representatives
will be counted.

--
Thank you
Emily Jiang on behalf of MicroProfile Steering Committee

_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg





_______________________________________________

microprofile-wg mailing list

microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx

To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit

https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg

_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg