Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT] [Health 3.1] Specification - Plan Review

["Kevin Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Edwin,
Plan Reviews are
only 1 week in duration.  Release Reviews are 2 weeks in duration
(or after 1 week if all members have voted).

From our MPSP:

• All specification ballot periods will have the durations outlined below (notwithstanding the exception process defined by the EFSP)
  • Creation Review: 7 calendar days;
  • Plan Review: 7 calendar days;
  • Progress Review: 14 calendar days;
  • Release Review: 14 calendar days;
  • Service Release Review: 14 calendar days; and
  • MPSP Update: 7 calendar days.

(This highlights
another
issue where
we don't seem to have a permanent home for the MPSP yet...)

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter 
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)



From:
       Edwin
Derks <ederks85@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
       Microprofile
WG discussions <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       05/13/2021
12:13
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT] [Health 3.1] Specification - Plan Review
- VOTE by May 12th - (1 Week)
Sent
by:        "microprofile-wg"
<microprofile-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---

Hi all,

It seems that I have incorrectly understood
the ballot time for Plan Reviews. The ballot concludes after at least 1
week when all members have voted. Or after two weeks, whether all votes
are in or not. This means that this ballot will remain open until and including
May 19th. In the meantime, it's possible for any outstanding votes to be
cast.

My apologies for this confusion.

Kind regards,

Edwin

On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 08:33, Edwin Derks
<ederks85@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi,

A friendly reminder that this is the
last day to vote on this ballot. The last vote needed is from iJUG.

Kind regards,

Edwin

On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 08:28, Edwin Derks
<ederks85@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
+1 (Committer Representative)

On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 20:11, David Blevins
<dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
+1 Tomitribe


-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

On May 5, 2021, at 10:50 AM, Edwin Derks
<ederks85@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

To approve
and ratify the Plan Review of MicroProfile Health 3.1, the Steering Committee
Representatives' vote is requested. Please respond with +1 (positive),
0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support
your vote will be appreciated.

  

The MicroProfile
Specification Process requires
the Specification Committee and the Community to provide feedback during
the approval process using the relevant documents:

1. https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.microprofile/releases/health-3.1

This ballot
will be 7 days, ending on Wednesday, May 12th.  The ballot requires
a Super-majority positive vote of the Steering Committee members. There
is no veto. Community input and Community votes are welcomed. However,
only the votes delivered by Steering Committee Representatives will be
counted.

--
Thank you
Edwin Derks
on behalf of the MicroProfile Steering Committee
_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg

_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg