[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [microprofile-wg] Payara as MicroProfile compliant implementation
|
Hi Rudy,
up to my knowledge the voting was done only for the release of
the individual specifications and the CCR was only one of the
required steps for the ballots to start. There is no official
marking on the implementations that we used for CCRs that they are
compatible as of now. The CCRs were only a demonstration in this
case that the TCKs can be passed. Many of the specifications still
have the CCR open in their issue lists.
Cheers,
Martin
On 4/29/21 8:24 AM, Rudy De Busscher
wrote:
Hi Emily,
There was indeed no guideline defined for MP 4.0 as umbrella
spec. But for an individual spec, pointing to the TCK results
is not enough as for releasing the spec itself, a CCR and voting
was required for the implementation of a spec.
You cannot expect different requirements for different
implementations of a specification (CCR and voting for the
first, pointing to the TCK results for the following ones).
Regards
Rudy
Technical Sales / Developer
Advocate
Payara
- Supported
Enterprise Software for Jakarta EE and
MicroProfile Applications
T: +1 415 523 0175
| UK: +44 207 754 0481 | M: 0044 7412 588 569
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payara-Tech LDA,
Registered Office: Rua Nova de São Pedro no. 54,
2nd floor, room “D”, 9000 048 Funchal, Ilha da
Madeira, Portugal
VAT: PT
515158674 | www.payara.fish | info@xxxxxxxxxxx | @Payara_Fish
If at any time you
would like to unsubscribe from
Payara communications, simply respond to this
email with 'Unsubscribe' in the title, or
instantly unsubscribe from all types of
communication here.
From my best knowledge, there was no compliance guideline
defined for MP 4.0, which was a marketing release. It is not
required to file CCRs for the implementation. CCR was for
releasing specifications. In Open Liberty, we ran our build
against MP tcks and documented the tset result
here. MP is in the process of defining the
certification process in the MP 4.1 release.
Thanks
Emily
Hi,
I am in the process of making Payara MP-4.0-compliant
implementation.
Currently, the only way I see to do this is to open CCRs for
each individual Specs.
Is there a plan in place to just have one CCR for all of
MicroProfile?
If there is, is there a timeframe for this to happen?
I am trying to decide if it’s worth to do CCRs for all the
Specs individually or wait
for the “umbrella” spec compatibility issue process to be
developed.
I would gladly contribute to this effort as well.
_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg
--
_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg