Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT] [Reactive Streams Operators 2.0] Specification Release Review - Please try to VOTE by April 19th (one weeks) Inbox

+1 (Payara)

Technical Sales / Developer Advocate

Payara - Supported Enterprise Software for Jakarta EE and MicroProfile Applications
T: +1 415 523 0175 | UK: +44 207 754 0481 | M: 0044 7412 588 569
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Payara-Tech LDA, Registered Office: Rua Nova de São Pedro no. 54, 2nd floor, room “D”, 9000 048 Funchal, Ilha da Madeira, Portugal

VAT: PT 515158674 | www.payara.fish | info@xxxxxxxxxxx | @Payara_Fish

If at any time you would like to unsubscribe from Payara communications, simply respond to this email with 'Unsubscribe' in the title, or instantly unsubscribe from all types of communication here.



From: microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Edwin Derks <ederks85@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 2:13 PM
To: mike@xxxxxxxxxxx <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Microprofile WG discussions <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT] [Reactive Streams Operators 2.0] Specification Release Review - Please try to VOTE by April 19th (one weeks) Inbox
 
+1 (Committer Representative)

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 21:05, Michael Redlich <mpredli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1 (Garden State JUG)


On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 1:59 PM Emily Jiang via microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As you may recall from my previous email, some staged artifacts were removed by Sonatype while the votings were happening (I have logged an issue and Sonatype will keep artifacts for 4 weeks from now on). MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators artifacts were among them. I re-staged the artifacts again for a 2nd vote. These artifacts are the same as the previous from a functional point of view. Please can we try to vote within one week! Here is the record for the previous voting result.

To approve and ratify the Release Review of MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators 2.0 Specification, the Steering Committee Representatives vote is requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated. 

The MicroProfile Specification Process requires the Specification Committee and the Community to provide feedback during the approval process using the relevant documents:

https://github.com/microprofile/microprofile-wg/issues/27

This ballot will be fourteen days, ending on Tuesday, March 30th. The ballot requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Steering Committee members. There is no veto. Community input and Community votes are welcomed. However, only the votes delivered by Steering Committee Representatives will be counted.

--
Thanks
Emily Jiang on behalf of MicroProfile Steering Committee

_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg


--
Code, TestWrite, Cycle, Run, Drink, Sleep ... Repeat
Java Queue Editor, InfoQ

Laissez Les Bon Temps Rouler
_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg

Back to the top