| RE: [mdt-papyrus.dev] Model Interchange |
|
Yann, Thanks very much for the update.
Would it be possible for you (or someone else) to produce similar results using
the “new” Papyrus, i.e. based on the source code that’s available at Eclipse? Thanks, Kenn
Hussey
Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. | www.embarcadero.com From: mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of TANGUY Yann
176637 Sure, you can dl Papyrus RCP here : http://www.papyrusuml.org/home/liblocal/docs/Papyrus/1.11/papyrus-1.11.0/RCPs/Papyrus-1.11.0-win32.x86.zip I
join the project with both models. The
archive contains the following files: -
KennXMITest_P1.di2 / .uml / .xmi : the model created from scratch (based on you
image) -
valid.di2 / .uml : the model initiated from your xmi file -
valid_original.xmi / .uml : a copy of your xmi file and its "manual"
conversion to uml with the UML2 sample editor. You may want to use this
copy to compare with other xmi files. -
valid_reexport.xmi : the "valid" model reexported back to xmi (still
via UML2 sample editor) after the creation of diagram in valid.di2. I was
curious to compare the initial valid.xmi to the same model after import /
export in the UML2 sample editor. regards, Yann ______________________
CEA
SACLAY DRT/LIST/DTSI/SOL/LISE 91191
Gif sur Yvette FRANCE email
: yann.tanguy@xxxxxx Tel
: + 33 1 69 08 87 63 Fax
: + 33 1 69 08 20 82 De: mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx de la
part de Kenn Hussey Thanks, Yann. Could you remind
me again where the “old” Papyrus can be found? Also, could you send me the XMI
for the models these diagrams are based on? Cheers, Kenn Hussey Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. | www.embarcadero.com From:
mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of TANGUY Yann
176637 Hi Kenn, I made the test with "old" Papyrus version, creating the
model from scratch, and importing your xmi (via UML2 sample editor) then
creating a class diagram that reference the imported model. You'll find the results joined to this mail. Regards Yann Tanguy. De :
mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Kenn Hussey Sébastien, Some (minor) changes have been
made to the test case. Could you base your model/diagram on the updated diagram
and “reference” XMI attached? Thanks, Kenn Hussey Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. | www.embarcadero.com From:
mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kenn Hussey Sebastien, Thanks for your willingness to
participate! To get started, could you please use Papyrus to produce a diagram
similar (as close as possible) to the attached reference diagram (the first
test case) and send a PNG image if it to me. Also, to participate in the
interchange initiative, we will need to provide “standard” UML 2.1.1 XMI based
on the semantic elements shown in the diagram. According to the rules of
engagement for the working group, there should be a user-accessible action to
trigger saving/exporting of the XMI, but it’s OK if that’s not the case
currently (e.g. I could use the UML2 sample editor to produce it for now). It would be great if you could
do this and send me the results by (my) Monday, although I realize that may be
pushing it… ;) Cheers, Kenn Hussey Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. | www.embarcadero.com From: GERARD Sebastien
166342 [mailto:Sebastien.GERARD@xxxxxx] Hi Kenn, Of course, that's sound good for us. I am also ok to work with you
on that task. Cheers… Sébastien. De :
mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Kenn Hussey Teams, There is an initiative underway at the OMG to try to
successfully demonstrate interchange between different products/tools that
support UML modeling. To date, I have been involved the working group that is
pursuing this, by helping prepare test cases. The basic idea is that, for each
test case, a reference diagram and XMI serialization are provided (so far by
me) and each participating vendor/tool is to 1) attempt to create the diagram
from scratch using their tool and save/export the corresponding XMI and 2)
attempt to open/import the XMI produced by the other vendors/tools and report
on the results. I think it should be important to us that tools based on the
reference open source implementation of UML (like UML2 Tools and Papyrus)
participate in this initiative. I would be happy to represent you in this
initiative, but first I would need an _expression_ of interest from you (e.g.
from your component/project lead) and a general commitment to fixing any issues
that are identified. What do you think? Please let me know if you have any questions and/or
concerns. Thanks, Kenn Hussey Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. | www.embarcadero.com |
![[Embarcadero Technologies Logo]](jpghZzPsj2iJg.jpg)