Hi 
     
    Bug/371659 branch currently queued for practice build. 
     
        Ed 
     
    On 15/02/2012 18:27, Ed Willink wrote:
    
      
      Hi Adolfo 
       
      Bug 371569 raised to change the com.google.collect from require
      bundle to import package, which then is compatible with Xtext
      2.2.1. 
       
      If I get a practice maintenance build done soon can be we get this
      in RC4? 
       
          Regards 
       
              Ed 
       
      On 15/02/2012 13:50, Adolfo Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera wrote:
      
        
        Hi Ed, 
         
        No problem about any suffix/preffix from the releng point of
        view. It's as easy as including it in the Build Alias. If we
        finally create new release after Indigo SR2, I'm also inclined
        to add some description specifically for the Category Name. For
        instance: 
         
        Eclipse OCL 3.1.2 (Xtext 2.2.1 compatible) 
         
        However, since Xtext ships 2.1.2 into Inidigo SR2, I hope there
        is not a real need for a new Release. 
         
        Regards, 
        Adolfo. 
         
        El 15/02/2012 7:17, Ed Willink escribió:
        Hi  
           
          Xtext 2.2.1 for (SR2) appears to have changed 'internal' APIs
          and so attempting to run OCLinEcore 3.1.1 with Xtext 2.2.1
          gives editor instantiation
          failures.https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=371574.
           
           
          While this is clearly an Xtext problem, it isn't going to be
          fixed for SR2 or SR2a, we can just hope that itemis learn how
          many of their 'internal' APIs are actually external and avoid
          the problem in the future.  
           
          Anyway it is our user's problem, so I think we need to create
          a 3.1.2X release in which we regenerate editors and raise the
          lower bound on Xtext to 2.2.1 to force compatibility. This is
          of course not allowed in an SR, so it isn't an SR as such. Is
          an X suffix enough, or do we want a longer more distinct name?
          Adolfo: is there any spelling that is particularly easy for
          releng?  
           
              Regards  
           
                  Ed  
          _______________________________________________  
          mdt-ocl.dev mailing list  
          mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
           
          https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
           
           
         
         
        
         
        
         
        _______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
 
         
        
         
        No virus
          found in this message. 
          Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
          Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2112/4810 - Release
          Date: 02/14/12 
       
       
       
      
       
      _______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
 
       
      
       
      No virus
        found in this message. 
        Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
        Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2112/4811 - Release Date:
        02/15/12 
     
     
  
 |