Hi Ed,
No problem about any suffix/preffix from the releng point of view.
It's as easy as including it in the Build Alias. If we finally
create new release after Indigo SR2, I'm also inclined to add some
description specifically for the Category Name. For instance:
Eclipse OCL 3.1.2 (Xtext 2.2.1 compatible)
However, since Xtext ships 2.1.2 into Inidigo SR2, I hope there is
not a real need for a new Release.
Regards,
Adolfo.
El 15/02/2012 7:17, Ed Willink escribió:
Hi
Xtext 2.2.1 for (SR2) appears to have changed 'internal' APIs and
so attempting to run OCLinEcore 3.1.1 with Xtext 2.2.1 gives
editor instantiation
failures.https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=371574.
While this is clearly an Xtext problem, it isn't going to be fixed
for SR2 or SR2a, we can just hope that itemis learn how many of
their 'internal' APIs are actually external and avoid the problem
in the future.
Anyway it is our user's problem, so I think we need to create a
3.1.2X release in which we regenerate editors and raise the lower
bound on Xtext to 2.2.1 to force compatibility. This is of course
not allowed in an SR, so it isn't an SR as such. Is an X suffix
enough, or do we want a longer more distinct name? Adolfo: is
there any spelling that is particularly easy for releng?
Regards
Ed
_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
|
