[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] bug and archive branches
|
Hi Axel
It's not perfect.
I have decluttered most of my bug branches by moving them to archive
branches, so wherever you see any archive branch you may delete the
corresponding remote tracking branch so that it stays gone. You may also
delete all the remote tracking archive branches so that the EGIT history
cleans up. Unfortunately the archive branches are still upstream so they
keep coming back. Maybe a clever fetch config would not fetch them.
Some of the archive branches can probably be deleted. I doubt any of
them will be useful after 3 months of archive.
I encourage you and Adolfo to endeavour to close out bug/branches so
that they can be archived.
The "zzbenchmark" branch was an accident.
The "benchmark" branch is now on my Github forked OCL repository; it
needs a CQ. See https://github.com/eclipse/ocl/network.
The "int" branch is 'active' and will go before long.
Regards
Ed
On 16/08/2011 21:24, Axel Uhl wrote:
Hi,
question regarding the archiving policy for bug branches: with
regularly fetching the git, I end up with branch duplicates for the
bug/archive branch tags. A fetch doesn't delete local branch tags when
they once made it into a cloned repository. I would have to manually
delete the bug/* branches after they got renamed in the central git
into archive/*. I don't think this is practical. Would you share this
observation? If so, we may re-consider the policy for bug branches.
Best,
-- Axel
_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3838 - Release Date: 08/16/11