[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
| 
RE: [mdt-ocl.dev] Interesting EMF enhancement and OCL Plan.
 | 
Hi All,
 
I am planning to create the draft plan in the 
expected format on Monday/Tuesday based on the discussed 
proposals.
 
Cheers,
- Alex.
Thanks, Ed. I've updated that page to add two additional enhancements 
(for a derived feature setting delegate and an operation invocation delegate).
Note that the time to prepare a plan for OCL 3.0 is running short; it must 
be complete, and in the expected format, by the end of September. Please let me 
know how I can help in this regard.
Cheers,
Kenn
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Ed Willink 
<ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
  Hi
I thought that Alex as lead 
  was producing a first cut plan, but obviously his time has been restricted 
  recently.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/MDT/OCL_3.0.0_API_Changes, which 
  Adolfo started and I update regularly, is well on the
way to being a plan. 
  Perhaps it should just be evolved a bit.
I've added an extra column for 
  the initials of whoever has undertaken to implement the change.
I've 
  added an extra table for outright enhancements and put 255786 there, perhaps 
  the description needs improving.
I've added another extra table for 
  unendorsed enhancements where anyone is welcome to identify contributions that 
  they are offering via Bugzilla.
    
  Ed
Kenn Hussey wrote: 
  
    
    
    Adolfo, 
    
    
    
    Cheers,
    
    Kenn
    2009/9/17 Adolfo Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera 
<adolfosbh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    
      Hi Team,
There is an 
      interesting bug which is being dealt by Kenn about a way to add constrains 
      annotated to ecore's models:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=255786Unfortunately, 
      at this moment I don't have time to revise it (not to much avaiable time 
      and I also have to revise some ed's pending patches). However, I think 
      that it's a valuable bug to take into account. Some other required 
      enhancements (
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=270974) 
      can be resolved in a better way if there is an EMF's standar solution to 
      include constraints in a metamodel. So if someone else have some available 
      time, I would recommend having a look to that bug.
On the other 
      hand, I must ping again regarding the needed discussion about MDT-OCL 
      plan. I haven't received any response in my last try.... Let me put some 
      items on the table if they may help:
- Project reorganization.
- 
      LPG v2 migration (grammars, parsing infrastructure, ...)
- UI addons: 
      EMF generated edit and editor, OCL text editor, OCL interpreter, 
      capabilities...
- OCL 2.1 specification adoption.
It seems a lot 
      a work, some  is completed, some in progress, some should be 
      rationalized to be able to plan it.... Comments are 
      welcomed.
Cheers,
Adolfo.
      
_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev 
      mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
 
_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev 
  mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev