Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] Interesting EMF enhancement and OCL Plan.

[Kenn Hussey <kenn.hussey@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Ed. I've updated that page to add two additional enhancements (for a derived feature setting delegate and an operation invocation delegate).

Note that the time to prepare a plan for OCL 3.0 is running short; it must be complete, and in the expected format, by the end of September. Please let me know how I can help in this regard.

Cheers,

Kenn

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Ed Willink <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi

I thought that Alex as lead was producing a first cut plan, but obviously his time has been restricted recently.

http://wiki.eclipse.org/MDT/OCL_3.0.0_API_Changes, which Adolfo started and I update regularly, is well on the
way to being a plan. Perhaps it should just be evolved a bit.

I've added an extra column for the initials of whoever has undertaken to implement the change.

I've added an extra table for outright enhancements and put 255786 there, perhaps the description needs improving.

I've added another extra table for unendorsed enhancements where anyone is welcome to identify contributions that they are offering via Bugzilla.

    Ed




Kenn Hussey wrote:

Adolfo,

I think there should definitely be an enhancement on the plan for adding a validation delegate implementation. We can always defer it if nobody finds the time. Note that I will also be working on https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=255469 and https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=216701, which would also merit corresponding changes in OCL; I think enhancements for these should be added to the plan as well.

Cheers,

Kenn

2009/9/17 Adolfo Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera <adolfosbh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Team,

There is an interesting bug which is being dealt by Kenn about a way to add constrains annotated to ecore's models:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=255786

Unfortunately, at this moment I don't have time to revise it (not to much avaiable time and I also have to revise some ed's pending patches). However, I think that it's a valuable bug to take into account. Some other required enhancements (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=270974) can be resolved in a better way if there is an EMF's standar solution to include constraints in a metamodel. So if someone else have some available time, I would recommend having a look to that bug.

On the other hand, I must ping again regarding the needed discussion about MDT-OCL plan. I haven't received any response in my last try.... Let me put some items on the table if they may help:

- Project reorganization.
- LPG v2 migration (grammars, parsing infrastructure, ...)
- UI addons: EMF generated edit and editor, OCL text editor, OCL interpreter, capabilities...
- OCL 2.1 specification adoption.

It seems a lot a work, some  is completed, some in progress, some should be rationalized to be able to plan it.... Comments are welcomed.

Cheers,
Adolfo.

--

Adolfo Sánchez-Barbudo Herrera adolfosbh(at)opencanarias(dot)com C/Elías Ramos González, 4, ofc. 304 38001 SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE Tel.: +34 922 240231 / +34 617 718268

_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev

_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev
  

_______________________________________________
mdt-ocl.dev mailing list
mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev