Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] What is the right way to implement extensions using the model

Hi Bob,

Thank you for your response.

Yes I'm familiar with BPMN 2.0 spec's extensibility model and yes it
is what is in my mind.

I checked for similar cases but I could not find a similar case. I
don't want to extend a  BPMN process programatically however I want to
provide my extension elements to the editor so that users can add them
through the editor tree.

Kind Regards,
Timur Sungur

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Bob Brodt <bbrodt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Timur,
> Are you familiar with BPMN 2.0 spec's extensibility model? Is that what you had in mind, or do you have different requirements?
> As an example, the following xml snippet extends the bpmn2 <process> element with attributes and values defined in a different namespace ("tns")
>   <bpmn2:process id="com.sample.bpmn" tns:version="1" tns:packageName="org.sample.bpmn.process" name="My Process">
>     <bpmn2:extensionElements>
>       <tns:global id="GlobalType_1" identifier="globalVar1" type="String"/>
>     </bpmn2:extensionElements>
> Regards,
> Bob Brodt
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Hi Everyone,
>> I need to implement some extensions on-top of existing BPMN
>> meta-model. Could you please tell me what is the right way of doing
>> it?
>> Is it possible to achieve this without changing the code in existing
>> plug-ins, i.e., implementing a separate plug-in which provides the
>> extensions to the editor?
>> Any help will be appreciated.
>> Best Regards,
>> Timur Sungur
>> _______________________________________________
>> mailing list
> _______________________________________________
> mailing list

Back to the top