[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [mdt-bpmn2.dev] What is the right way to implement extensions using the model
- From: Timur Sungur <timurhan.s@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:08:48 +0200
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Thank you for your response.
Yes I'm familiar with BPMN 2.0 spec's extensibility model and yes it
is what is in my mind.
I checked for similar cases but I could not find a similar case. I
don't want to extend a BPMN process programatically however I want to
provide my extension elements to the editor so that users can add them
through the editor tree.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Bob Brodt <bbrodt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Timur,
> Are you familiar with BPMN 2.0 spec's extensibility model? Is that what you had in mind, or do you have different requirements?
> As an example, the following xml snippet extends the bpmn2 <process> element with attributes and values defined in a different namespace ("tns")
> <bpmn2:process id="com.sample.bpmn" tns:version="1" tns:packageName="org.sample.bpmn.process" name="My Process">
> <tns:global id="GlobalType_1" identifier="globalVar1" type="String"/>
> Bob Brodt
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Hi Everyone,
>> I need to implement some extensions on-top of existing BPMN
>> meta-model. Could you please tell me what is the right way of doing
>> Is it possible to achieve this without changing the code in existing
>> plug-ins, i.e., implementing a separate plug-in which provides the
>> extensions to the editor?
>> Any help will be appreciated.
>> Best Regards,
>> Timur Sungur
>> mdt-bpmn2.dev mailing list
> mdt-bpmn2.dev mailing list