|Re: [m2e-users] Project configuration is not up-to-date with pom.xml|
You seem to have OEPE installed, which contributes ADFEJBProjectConfigurator. This project configurator is active because your project contains “src/META-INF/weblogic-ejb-jar.xml.” However, when the configurator attempts to get a version of the WLS EJB facet, it fails because the project is not using WLS as the runtime (as far as I can tell.) The code in question could use a little attention, I see, but you should be able to solve the issue for yourself in your project setup. If you’re not using WLS as the project’s runtime then you shouldn’t need the “weblogic-ejb-jar.xml” file; delete it and this configurator will no longer be activate.
This is definitely not an m2e issue. You need to seek support from Oracle on that one.
Le 11 nov. 2013 17:00, "Jarlath Reidy" <jarlathreidy@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
This issue has raised it's head again. I would be happy with a workaround for this. When I run Maven -> Update Project, if I uncheck "Update project configuration from pom.xml" then I don't get this error. However then I am left with the original problem where eclipse complains that "Project configuration is not up-to-date with pom.xml" under Markers->Maven Problems.
If Igor represents the thinking of the m2e developers then I imagine there is no point in reporting this. I'd be happy with a workaround.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Ilko Iliev <ilkomiliev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
regarding metadata - m2e handles them correctly, however the scm has troubles with them, because they are in conflict, if say the developer 1 references them via maven repo and developer 2 has them in the local workbench (maintainer of the lib)... so, we removed them at last from our subversion repository. I don't have experience with other scm tools
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Igor Fedorenko <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, yes.
Don't report this as an m2e bug unless the problem can be reproduced
This is not true. m2e is expected to work with eclipse metadata files
<thunderaxiom@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:thunderaxiom@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Back to the top