Re: [lyo-dev] Issue Getting and Setting Test Plan's Related Change Reque

[Daniel Chirillo <chirillo@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the confirmation.  The
thing is, I need to create OSLC links and thus need to PUT things back.
 The big lesson learned today is that if you PUT back, you better
have done a GET on the entire asset, or else when you PUT it back,
you're going to lose (i.e., not put back) whatever you didn't GET.  I
suppose the other option would be to do a partial update.  Does the
API support doing a partial update of OSLC links?


Regards,

Daniel Chirillo
IBM Software Services for Rational
1-720-395-0914  (voice & fax)
chirillo@xxxxxxxxxx



From:      
 Paul McMahan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To:      
 Lyo project developer
discussions <lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:      
 Lyo project developer
discussions <lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, lyo-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:      
 01/22/2014 03:02 PM
Subject:    
   Re: [lyo-dev]
Issue Getting and Setting Test        Plan's
       Related        Change
       Requests
Sent by:    
   lyo-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

If you need to get a testplan which
has a particular web ID then using the query is the best approach.  
You should be able to include the test plan's list of related change requests
in the query response instead of doing a additional GET if you add "oslc_qm:relatedChangeRequest"
to the select.

Best wishes,
Paul McMahan
IBM Rational

Daniel
Chirillo---01/22/2014 02:46:00 PM---User error, which I discovered while
writing this response.  Full disclosure:  in my particular use

From: Daniel Chirillo/New York/IBM@IBMUS
To: Lyo project developer discussions
<lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 01/22/2014 02:46 PM
Subject: Re: [lyo-dev] Issue Getting
and Setting Test Plan's Related Change Requests
Sent by: lyo-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

User error, which I discovered while writing this response. 

Full disclosure:  in my particular use case the staring point is the
RQM reportable REST API; I then switch to OSLC.  Here are the details
of how I was actually doing the GET (@Paul:  Is there a better way
to GET a test asset if your starting point is the web ID of the asset?).
 The problem was the use of setSelect(): 

public TestPlan getTestPlanByWebId(String
testPlanWebId) { 

               TestPlan theOslcTestPlan
= null;
               if
(rqmTestPlanQueryCapability
== null)
{ 
                    
  rqmTestPlanQueryCapability
= getTestPlanQueryCapability(); 
               }

               OslcQueryParameters queryParams
= new
OslcQueryParameters(); 
               queryParams.setWhere("oslc:shortId="
+ testPlanWebId); 
               queryParams.setSelect("dcterms:identifier,oslc:shortId,dcterms:title");
//THE PROBLEM 
               OslcQuery query = new
OslcQuery(rqmClient,
rqmTestPlanQueryCapability,
                    
          1, queryParams);

               OslcQueryResult result
= query.submit(); 

               for
(TestPlan tp : result.getMembers(TestPlan.class))
{ 
                    
  theOslcTestPlan = tp; 
               }

               return
theOslcTestPlan; 
} 


Changing the for loop in that method to this fixed the issue:

for (TestPlan tp : result.getMembers(TestPlan.class))
{ 
       theOslcTestPlan = tp; 
       try
{ 
               theOslcTestPlan = rqmClient.getResource(
                    
                  theOslcTestPlan.getAbout().toString(),
                    
                  OslcMediaType.APPLICATION_RDF_XML).getEntity(
                    
                  TestPlan.class);
               } catch
(IOException e) { 
                    
  e.printStackTrace(); 
               } catch
(OAuthException e) { 
                    
  e.printStackTrace(); 
               } catch
(URISyntaxException e) { 
                    
  e.printStackTrace(); 
               }
       } 



Regards, 

Daniel Chirillo 
IBM Software Services for Rational 
1-720-395-0914  (voice & fax) 
chirillo@xxxxxxxxxx 



From:        Paul
McMahan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS 
To:        Lyo
project developer discussions <lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:        "Lyo
project developer discussions" <lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, lyo-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:        01/22/2014
02:13 PM 
Subject:        Re:
[lyo-dev] Issue Getting and Setting Test Plan's Related      
 Change        Requests 
Sent by:        lyo-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

I don't see a problem with TestPlan class in Lyo, and you mentioned that
you observed this behavior with CLM 4.0.5.   Are there some intermediate
steps such as GET or PUT resources to the CLM server that are required
to recreate this issue?


Best wishes,
Paul McMahan
IBM Rational

Daniel
Chirillo---01/22/2014 11:25:08 AM---I'm seeing the following behavior with
CLM 4.0.5: 1.  TestPlan.getRelatedChangeRequests() always ret

From: Daniel Chirillo/New York/IBM@IBMUS
To: "Lyo project developer discussions"
<lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 01/22/2014 11:25 AM
Subject: [lyo-dev] Issue Getting
and Setting Test Plan's Related Change Requests
Sent by: lyo-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

I'm seeing the following behavior with CLM 4.0.5: 

1.  TestPlan.getRelatedChangeRequests() always returns an empty array.

2.  TestPlan.addRelatedChangeRequest() sets instead of adds, i.e.,
adds the change request you pass it and blows away the change requests
that are already linked to the plan. 


Regards, 

Daniel Chirillo 
IBM Software Services for Rational 
1-720-395-0914  (voice & fax) 
chirillo@xxxxxxxxxx_______________________________________________
lyo-dev mailing list
lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lyo-dev
_______________________________________________
lyo-dev mailing list
lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lyo-dev
_______________________________________________
lyo-dev mailing list
lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lyo-dev
_______________________________________________
lyo-dev mailing list
lyo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/lyo-dev