[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools 0.9.1 Build
|
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 3:09:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools 0.9.1 Build
>
> On 01/19/2012 10:47 AM, Otávio Pontes wrote:
> > On 01/19/2012 10:16 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta"<wainersm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> To: linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 1:55:36 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools 0.9.1 Build
> >>>
> >>> Jeff,
> >>>
> >>> What if merge RDT branch (only common remote infra) for 0.9.1? Do
> >>> you
> >>> think doable?
> >>
> >> 0.9.1 is supposed to be pure bugfix release and this doesn't sound
> >> like one.
> >> If you feel like there is a need for new release with new
> >> functionality in it we can always do
> >> 0.10 before June.
>
> Oh, sure, makes sense.
>
> >>
> >
> > What is expected for June? 1.0?
> >
> > Releases with new functionality require release review and pmc
> > approval so if we try to do such thing
> >> it will slow down the 0.9.1 release and make it miss the SR2
> >> deadline.
> >> Sorry if I misunderstood smth.
> >
> > What about releasing Perf and the RDT branch in a 0.10 release? Is
> > the
> > process of creating a new release complicated? I can help you if
> > you
> > want in that. Can't we do 0.10 and 0.9.1 in parallel? So that we
> > can
> > do 0.9.1 before the deadline.
>
> Just an complement of Otávio's thoughts: we are eager to consume Perf
> and RDT branch but we can't wait until June so, from our side it is
> really desired an 0.10 release. Thanks Otávio for kindly volunteer to
> help on this release!
>
> Our team is working/thinking on solutions for remote Valgrind, RPM,
> Oprofile, Perf (plans for the future) and Autotools (actually, only
> testing integration with PTP of Jeff's work) with assumption that
> Jeff's
> RDT branch will be merged in near future and also will become the
> common
> infrastructure for remote enablement of Linux Tools plug-ins.
>
> Perf is already into the master branch. We have sent fixes but there
> is
> more to be done (e.g. an user guide plug-in).
Having 0.10 before June is perfectly fine (actually I expected it). Please consider that it takes few weeks to get the iplog approved and etc. and start a new mail thread proposing having 0.10 release and some date for it. Once there is agreement about it details won't be a problem.
Alex
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Alex
> >>
> >>>
> >>> - Wainer
> >>>
> >>> On 01/18/2012 09:06 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> >>>> I am going to make a 0.9.1 build for SR2. It will include the
> >>>> p2.inf
> >>>> changes to automatically add our update site that weren't in the
> >>>> 0.9.0
> >>>> release plus the moving of the dataviewer classes to their own
> >>>> feature.
> >>>>
> >>>> Do not make any changes to the stable-0.9 branch.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> -- Jeff J.
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> >>>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> >>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> >> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linuxtools-dev mailing list
> > linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>
