[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [keyple-dev] Issue towards using UseCase4 & 10 with SAM-S1 E1
|
Dear Jean-Pierre,
I tried that and the status (logs shared in previous email)
remains the same:
C:\Windows\System32>sc query
ScDeviceEnum
SERVICE_NAME: ScDeviceEnum
TYPE : 30 WIN32
STATE : 1 STOPPED
WIN32_EXIT_CODE : 0 (0x0)
SERVICE_EXIT_CODE : 0 (0x0)
CHECKPOINT : 0x0
WAIT_HINT : 0x0
C:\Windows\System32>sc query CertPropSvc
SERVICE_NAME: CertPropSvc
TYPE : 20 WIN32_SHARE_PROCESS
STATE : 1 STOPPED
WIN32_EXIT_CODE : 1077 (0x435)
SERVICE_EXIT_CODE : 0 (0x0)
CHECKPOINT : 0x0
WAIT_HINT : 0x0
C:\Windows\System32>sc config ScDeviceEnum start= disabled
[SC] ChangeServiceConfig SUCCESS
C:\Windows\System32>sc config CertPropSvc start= disabled
[SC] ChangeServiceConfig SUCCESS
Best regards,
Thillai Elayaraja S
|
Thillai
Elayaraja S |
CTO |
+91 72593 34534 |
thillaielayaraja.s@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|
ELYCTIS
India Pte Ltd |
Level 7, Mfar Greenheart |
Manyata Tech Park |
Bengaluru
560045 |
INDIA |
On 04-07-2025 05:33 pm, Jean-Pierre
Fortune wrote:
Hi Thillai,
This is a significant step forward! The fact that the secure
transaction now goes all the way through is excellent news, as
it confirms good communication between your reader, the card,
and the SAM.
The final error you're encountering, related to the card's
verification of the signature calculated by the SAM, isn't
necessarily directly related to the software you're running.
Most frequently, this problem is linked to interference
from Windows smart card services. Specifically, these are
the "Smart Card Device Enumeration Service" (ScDeviceEnum
)
and the "Certificate Propagation Service" (CertPropSvc
).
These services can unfortunately insert invisible exchanges
with the card or the SAM, causing the cryptographic
calculations to fail.
Could you please try disabling these services and let us
know if this resolves the issue?
To check their status before disabling them, you can run
the following commands in an elevated Command
Prompt (Run as Administrator):
sc query ScDeviceEnum
sc query CertPropSvc
This will tell you whether the services are currently
running. You can also check their startup configuration
using:
sc qc ScDeviceEnum
sc qc CertPropSvc
To stop and disable the services (again, in an elevated
Command Prompt), use:
sc stop ScDeviceEnum
sc config ScDeviceEnum start= disabled
sc stop CertPropSvc
sc config CertPropSvc start= disabled
We remain at your disposal for any further assistance.
Best regards,
Jean-Pierre Fortune
Keyple-Dev Team
Dear Jean-Pierre,
I tried to adapt both of the examples and attached the
Console log received.
The adaptation I made was to change the AID
to "304554502E494341" and the SFI_ENVIRONMENT_AND_HOLDER
to 0x14
(with UseCase10 used SFI_CONTRACTS
as 0x15 but unsure about SFI_EVENTS_LOG
and SFI_CONTRACT_LIST)
With that it seems it has progressed a bit more in either
of the examples but I can't make it work to see it
complete gracefully.
It seems to me that the card is not personalized on my
side.
Could you confirm and guide me on the right example to
start with ?
By the way, it is my first few days working with Calypso:
I see that although a bit of learning curve is required
(atleast for me), Keyple is making it far more easier than
I thought. Kudos to all of you.
Best regards,
Thillai Elayaraja S
|
Thillai
Elayaraja S |
CTO |
+91 72593 34534 |
thillaielayaraja.s@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|
ELYCTIS
India Pte Ltd |
Level 7, Mfar
Greenheart |
Manyata Tech Park |
Bengaluru
560045 |
INDIA |
On 04-07-2025 01:27 pm, Jean-Pierre Fortune wrote:
Hi Thillai,
Thanks for reaching out to the Keyple-Dev community
and for providing these detailed logs.
Based on our analysis of the logs, the issue doesn't
seem to be at the physical communication level. The
exchanges between your reader and the card appear to
be correct. The errors you're encountering are
happening at a higher, application command level.
Specifically, in the log for UseCase10
,
the OPEN_SECURE_SESSION
command fails
with a 6A82
status word, which
means "File not found". This command is trying to read
record 1 of the file located by SFI (Short File
Identifier) 0x06.
However, the JSON file generated by the card analysis
tool shows that a file with SFI=0x06 does not actually
exist on your card sample. This mismatch is the direct
cause of the error.
This leads us to the main question: have you
adapted the APDU commands in the examples to match
the specific file structure of the card you are
using?
It seems likely that adapting the SFI and record
parameters within the commands to align with your
card's actual file system should resolve the issue.
The good news is that this suggests your reader is
indeed capable of handling the low-level Calypso
protocol correctly.
Let us know if adjusting the commands solves the
problem.
Best regards,
Jean-Pierre Fortune
Keyple-Dev Team
Dear Keyple-Dev team,
Good day! I'm Thillai Elayaraja, CTO of ELYCTIS.
Currently I'm evaluating Calypso support with our
PC/SC readers with a Calypso card sample + SAM
acquired from ISRA.
The Calypso card sample is labelled as ST23ZR08
Calypso CD21 Rev 3.1 and
The SAM sample is labelled as INTEROP
vFF.E0.42 SAM-S1 E1.
With them I tried the examples UseCase4 and
UseCase10 from Keyple but encounter issues
detailed below. I tried to adapt those examples to
use the reader regex, Card AID (taken from the
Card Configuration Audit tool) and also changed
the LegacySamUtil.buildPowerOnDataFilter()
to use LegacySam.ProductType.SAM_S1E1,
with vain. I got to know from one of the CNA
contacts to seek help from the Keyple-Dev
community and that's where here I'am with the
details given below:
Regarding the examples:
- UseCase4_CardAuthentication:
Attached the UseCase4_CardAuthentication.log
for reference.
For info, the code stopped at processCommands
as below:

- UseCase10_SessionTrace_TN313:
Attached the UseCase10_SessionTrace_TN313.log
for reference.
For info, the log ends with the following error:
[11:01:01:138]
[pool-1-thread-1] [ERROR] CardReaderObserver -
[Transaction failed with
exception: A card command error occurred
while processing responses to card commands:
OPEN_SECURE_SESSION
Transaction audit JSON data:
{"targetSmartCard":{"selectApplicationResponse":{"apdu":"6F228408334D54522E494341A516BF0C13C70800000000750D264E53070A2D20021010019000","statusWord":"9000"},"isExtendedModeSupported":false,"isRatificationOnDeselectSupported":true,"isSvFeatureAvailable":false,"isPinFeatureAvailable":false,"isPkiModeSupported":false,"isDfInvalidated":false,"calypsoCardClass":"ISO","calypsoSerialNumber":"00000000750D264E","startupInfo":"0A2D2002101001","productType":"PRIME_REVISION_3","dfName":"334D54522E494341","modificationsCounterMax":"01AE","isModificationCounterInBytes":true,"files":[],"filesBackup":[],"svLastTNum":"00","svLastTNumBackup":"00","isHce":false,"svKvc":"00","applicationSubType":"02","applicationType":"20","sessionModification":"0A","payloadCapacity":"FA","isCounterValuePostponed":false,"isLegacyCase1":false},"apdus":["008A0B3904AF711A9400","6A82"]}
[11:01:01:138] [pool-1-thread-1] [INFO]
ObservableLocalReaderAdapter - Reader [ELYCTIS
CL reader FFFFFFFF0000 0] starts card removal
sequence
Regarding Card Configuration Audit tools:
- Attached the Tool_AnalyzeCardFileStructure-2.0.3.log
and the generated 20250626_CardData_1963796046.json
for reference.
- Attached the Tool_CheckCardFileStructure-2.0.3.log
for reference.
With these logs and info, could you help if I
need to adapt the examples further to verify the
intended use-cases ? And can we "tentatively" say
if our reader is capable to support Calypso
transactions ?
Thanking you.
With best regards,
Thillai Elayaraja S
P S : Soon we will try to procure the test kits
from CNA to validate our readers with all usecases
and with the demonstrator app.
_______________________________________________
keyple-dev mailing list
keyple-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/keyple-dev